Cited by 416Student Stress and CopingStress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Resilience, stress, and psychological well-being in nursing students: A systematic review

Open access
Li, Zhuang-Shuang, Hasson, Felicity·2020·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Objective Synthesize the evidence relating to the interaction of resilience, stress, and well-being in undergraduate nursing students across countries.Design Systematic review DATA SOURCES: Peer reviewed studies published from 2008 to December 2018 were searched in CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline (OVID), PsycINFo and four biomedical databases originating from China (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, VIP and CMB).Review methods Adhering to the preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, eight databases were searched. Twelve studies, which met the inclusion criteria, were extracted, and subject to quality appraisal by two researchers.Results In total, 12 papers were included. Outcome analysis revealed the level of resilience as moderate; stress levels were high and the incidence of negative psychological health accounts for a proportion of nursing students. The interaction between resilience and stress and well-being was high. Resilience and low stress were found to better predict well-being. All the studies cited recommendations to inform educational policy and practice in relation to resilience, well-being, and stress among undergraduate nursing students.Conclusions This was the first systematic review to synthesize the evidence relating to the interaction of resilience, stress, and well-being in undergraduate nursing students across cultural settings. Evidence confirms the importance of resilience in nursing students influencing stress and psychosocial morbidity. Nursing educational strategies that foster and enhance resilience is recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104440

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z.-S., & Hasson, F.
Affiliations
University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Hasson, Felicity
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
90
Pages
104440
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016870243
Cited by
416
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
resilience, stress, psychological well-being, nursing students, undergraduate nursing education, psychosocial morbidity, nursing education strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review