Cited by 1,175Resilience and Mental HealthNursing education and managementStress and Burnout Research

Personal resilience as a strategy for surviving and thriving in the face of workplace adversity: a literature review

Jackson, Debra, Firtko, Angela, Edenborough, Michel·2007·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim This paper is a report of a literature review to explore the concept of personal resilience as a strategy for responding to workplace adversity and to identify strategies to enhance personal resilience in nurses. Background Workplace adversity in nursing is associated with excessive workloads, lack of autonomy, bullying and violence and organizational issues such as restructuring, and has been associated with problems retaining nurses in the workforce. However, despite these difficulties many nurses choose to remain in nursing, and survive and even thrive despite a climate of workplace adversity. Data sources The literature CINAHL, EBSCO, Medline and Pubmed databases were searched from 1996 to 2006 using the keywords 'resilience', 'resilience in nursing', and 'workplace adversity' together with 'nursing'. Papers in English were included. Findings Resilience is the ability of an individual to positively adjust to adversity, and can be applied to building personal strengths in nurses through strategies such as: building positive and nurturing professional relationships; maintaining positivity; developing emotional insight; achieving life balance and spirituality; and, becoming more reflective. Conclusion Our findings suggest that nurses can actively participate in the development and strengthening of their own personal resilience to reduce their vulnerability to workplace adversity and thus improve the overall healthcare setting. We recommend that resilience-building be inc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04412.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, D., Firtko, A., & Edenborough, M.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Sydney South West Area Health Service (AU)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Debra
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-29
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2170992198
Cited by
1,175
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 38
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
personal resilience, workplace adversity, nurses, resilience strategies, nurse retention, workplace harassment, workplace violence, nursing workload, professional relationships, spirituality, reflective practice, mentoring, nursing education
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Nurses, Nursing Staff, Workload, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review