Cited by 295Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionMotor Control and Adaptation

Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis

Open access
Molenberghs, Pascal, Cunnington, Ross, Mattingley, Jason B.·2009·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

It has been suggested that the mirror neuron system provides an important neural substrate for humans' ability to imitate. Mirror neurons have been found during single-cell recordings in monkeys in area F5 and PF. It is believed that the human equivalent of this mirror system in humans is the pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus (area 44) and the rostral part of the inferior parietal lobule. This article critically reviews published fMRI studies that examined the role of frontal and parietal brain regions in imitation. A meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation (ALE) revealed that the superior parietal lobule, inferior parietal lobule, and the dorsal premotor cortex but not the inferior frontal gyrus, are all commonly involved in imitation. An additional meta-analysis using a label-based review confirmed that in the frontal lobe, the premotor cortex rather than the inferior frontal gyrus is consistently active in studies investigating imitation. In the parietal region the superior and inferior parietal lobules are equally activated during imitation. Our results suggest that parietal and frontal regions which extend beyond the classical mirror neuron network are crucial for imitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent meta-analysis of functional imaging studies found consistent responses during imitation tasks in classical MN areas, suggesting a possible functional involvement of MNs in imitation.

    “A recent meta-analysis of functional imaging studies found consistent responses during imitation tasks in classical MN areas, suggesting a possible functional involvement of MNs in imitation”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Molenberghs, Cunnington, & Mattingley, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Molenberghs, Pascal
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
975-980
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992429025
Cited by
295
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 23
FWCI
26.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
mirror neuron system, imitation, mirror neurons, inferior frontal gyrus, superior parietal lobule, inferior parietal lobule, dorsal premotor cortex, frontal lobe, parietal lobe
MeSH terms
Frontal Lobe, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Likelihood Functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review