Cited by 148Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Multisensory perceptual learning and sensory substitution

Proulx, Michael J., Brown, David J., Pasqualotto, Achille, Meijer, Peter·2014·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

One of the most exciting recent findings in neuroscience has been the capacity for neural plasticity in adult humans and animals. Studies of perceptual learning have provided key insights into the mechanisms of neural plasticity and the changes in functional neuroanatomy that it affords. Key questions in this field of research concern how practice of a task leads to specific or general improvement. Although much of this work has been carried out with a focus on a single sensory modality, primarily visual, there is increasing interest in multisensory perceptual learning. Here we will examine how advances in perceptual learning research both inform and can be informed by the development and advancement of sensory substitution devices for blind persons. To allow 'sight' to occur in the absence of visual input through the eyes, visual information can be transformed by a sensory substitution device into a representation that can be processed as sound or touch, and thus give one the potential to 'see' through the ears or tongue. Investigations of auditory, visual and multisensory perceptual learning can have key benefits for the advancement of sensory substitution, and the study of sensory deprivation and sensory substitution likewise will further the understanding of perceptual learning in general and the reverse hierarchy theory in particular. It also has significant importance for the developing understanding of the brain in metamodal terms, where functional brain areas might be best defined by the computations they carry out rather than by their sensory-specific processing role.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.017

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence of multisensory perceptual learning is encouraging for the idea of multisensory sensory substitution.

    “For example, evidence of multisensory perceptual learning (Proulx et al., 2014) is encouraging for the idea of multisensory sensory substitution.”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Proulx et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proulx, M. J., Brown, D. J., Pasqualotto, A., & Meijer, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Proulx, Michael J.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
41
Pages
16-25
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025256102
Cited by
148
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J017205/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
sensory substitution devices, neuroplasticity, visual impairment, auditory perceptual learning, visual perceptual learning, sensory deprivation
MeSH terms
Animals, Auditory Perception, Blindness, Brain, Humans, Learning, Models, Neurological, Neuronal Plasticity, Perception, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review