Cited by 8Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Integration and binding in rehabilitative sensory substitution: Increasing resolution using a new Zooming-in approach

Open access
Buchs, Galit, Maidenbaum, Shachar, Levy-Tzedek, Shelly, Amedi, Amir·2015·Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience

Abstract

PURPOSE: To visually perceive our surroundings we constantly move our eyes and focus on particular details, and then integrate them into a combined whole. Current visual rehabilitation methods, both invasive, like bionic-eyes and non-invasive, like Sensory Substitution Devices (SSDs), down-sample visual stimuli into low-resolution images. Zooming-in to sub-parts of the scene could potentially improve detail perception. Can congenitally blind individuals integrate a 'visual' scene when offered this information via different sensory modalities, such as audition? Can they integrate visual information -perceived in parts - into larger percepts despite never having had any visual experience? METHODS: We explored these questions using a zooming-in functionality embedded in the EyeMusic visual-to-auditory SSD. Eight blind participants were tasked with identifying cartoon faces by integrating their individual components recognized via the EyeMusic's zooming mechanism. RESULTS: After specialized training of just 6-10 hours, blind participants successfully and actively integrated facial features into cartooned identities in 79±18% of the trials in a highly significant manner, (chance level 10% ; rank-sum P < 1.55E-04). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that even users who lacked any previous visual experience whatsoever can indeed integrate this visual information with increased resolution. This potentially has important practical visual rehabilitation implications for both invasive and non-invasive methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/rnn-150592

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kim D. (1984). Functional roles of the inner and outer hair cell subsystems in the cochlea and brainstem In Berlin C.I. (Ed.), Hearing science: Recent advantages (pp. 241– 261). San Diego: College-Hill Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchs, G., Maidenbaum, S., Levy-Tzedek, S., & Amedi, A.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Recanati School for Community Health Professions, Department of Physical Therapy, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
  • Institut de la Vision (FR)
Corresponding author
Amedi, Amir
Venue
Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience
Published
2015-10-28
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
97-105
ISSN
  • 0922-6028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-3627
OpenAlex
W1863754572
Cited by
8
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • Israel Science Foundation (1684/08)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (310809)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
sensory substitution devices, visual rehabilitation, congenital blindness, face recognition (cognition), perceptual integration
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Algorithms, Blindness, Face, Female, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Practice, Psychological, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review