Cited by 139Tryptophan and brain disordersSchizophrenia research and treatmentImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Acute variations of cytokine levels after antipsychotic treatment in drug-naïve subjects with a first-episode psychosis: A meta-analysis

Capuzzi, Enrico, Bartoli, Francesco, Crocamo, Cristina, Clerici, Massimo, Carrà, Giuseppe·2017·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Schizophrenia is likely to be associated with immunological abnormalities. However, antipsychotics may induce immunomodulatory effects, by influencing plasma cytokines. In order to distinguish these influences, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the acute effect of antipsychotics on candidate cytokines plasma levels (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α) among drug-naïve subjects with first episode psychosis. We searched main Electronic Databases, identifying eight studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Plasma cytokines values were used to estimate standardized mean differences. Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated using the I 2 index and controlled in relevant sensitivity analyses. IL-2 (p=0.023) and IL-6 (p=0.012) levels showed a significant decrease after four weeks of antipsychotic treatment. Relevant sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings. IL-1β had high between-study heterogeneity. However, leaving out one study, a significant decrease after treatment was found. IL-6 and IL-2, and possibly IL-1β, could be considered state markers, decreasing after antipsychotic treatment, whilst TNF-α, IL-17, and IFN-γ might be considered trait markers. Options for novel treatments in FEP, involving cytokine-modulating agents, should be further studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.003

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capuzzi, E., Bartoli, F., Crocamo, C., Clerici, M., & Carrà, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Capuzzi, Enrico
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
77
Pages
122-128
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592490726
Cited by
139
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, first-episode psychosis, plasma cytokines, interleukin-6, interleukin-2, IL-1β, TNF-α, interferon-gamma, IL-17, immunomodulation, drug-naive patients, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Antipsychotic Agents, Cytokines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review