Cited by 70Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Alzheimer's-type neuropathology in the precuneus is not increased relative to other areas of neocortex across a range of cognitive impairment

Open access
Nelson, Peter T., Abner, Erin L., Scheff, Stephen W., Schmitt, Frederick A., Kryscio, Richard J., Jicha, Gregory A., Smith, Charles D., Patel, Ela +1 more·2009·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

We studied Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology in the precuneus and surrounding brain areas. Anatomically, the precuneus corresponds to the medial portion of human cerebral cortical Brodmann Area 7. This study utilized patients from the University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Center autopsy cohort. Data from 47 brains were used comprising patients of differing antemortem cognitive impairment severities, each with longitudinal clinical data and extensive neuropathological data. We assessed whether the precuneus and surrounding areas are differentially vulnerable to AD-type pathological lesions (diffuse amyloid plaques, neuritic amyloid plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles). Eleven areas of brain were evaluated for each case: amygdala, hippocampal CA1, subiculum, entorhinal cortex, frontal cortex, superior and middle temporal gyri, inferior parietal lobule, occipital cortex, posterior cingulate gyrus, Brodmann Area 31, and the precuneus proper. Like other areas of neocortex, the precuneus demonstrated increased diffuse and neuritic amyloid plaques early in the evolution in AD, and increased neurofibrillary tangles late in AD. Correcting for the antemortem cognitive status of the patients, there was no evidence of an increase in the density of AD-type pathology in the precuneus or neighboring areas relative to other areas of cerebral neocortex. Our results are not consistent with the idea that the precuneus is involved in a special way with plaques or tangles relative to other areas of neocortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.11.006

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evaluation of AD status was conducted using National Institute on Aging Reagan Institute guidelines including evaluation of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic senile plaques.

    “Evaluation of AD status was conducted by the AD Center Neuropathology and Clinical Cores using guidelines set forth by the National Institute on Aging Reagan Institute that included evaluation of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic senile plaques [36–38].”

    From Predominant expression of Alzheimer’s disease-associated BIN1 in mature oligodendrocytes and localization to white matter tracts (2016) · cites this paper as [36]

    The study description (page unavailable) says the University of Kentucky Alzheimer’s Disease Center routinely counted neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques, and that patients received post-mortem consensus diagnoses. Our copy does not state that AD status was evaluated under National Institute on Aging–Reagan Institute guidelines or identify the AD Center Neuropathology and Clinical Cores as conducting that evaluation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PIB retention within a brain generally indicates the presence of Aβ plaques.

    “Brain retention may reflect plaque or non-plaque fibrillar Aβ binding, and possibly also Aβ-independent phenomena, but PIB retention within a brain generally indicates the presence of Aβ plaques [69, 70].”

    From Brain aging, Alzheimer's disease, and mitochondria (2011) · cites this paper as [70]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, P. T., Abner, E. L., Scheff, S. W., Schmitt, F. A., Kryscio, R. J., Jicha, G. A., Smith, C. D., Patel, E., & Markesbery, W. R.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Peter T.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
450
Issue
3
Pages
336-339
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162755825
Cited by
70
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG005144, P30AG028383)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K08NS050110)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, precuneus, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, cognitive impairment, neocortex, posterior cingulate cortex
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Cognition Disorders, Hippocampus, Humans, Nerve Degeneration, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Disease Progression, Neocortex, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review