Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry

Open access
Leow, Alex D., Klunder, Andrea D., Jack, Clifford R., Toga, Arthur W., Dale, Anders M., Bernstein, Matt A., Britson, Paula J., Gunter, Jeffrey L., Ward, Chadwick P., Whitwell, Jennifer L., Borowski, Bret J., Fleisher, Adam S., Fox, Nick C., Harvey, Danielle, Kornak, John, Schuff, Norbert, Studholme, Colin, Alexander, Gene E., Weiner, Michael W., Thompson, Paul M.·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

Measures of brain change can be computed from sequential MRI scans, providing valuable information on disease progression, e.g., for patient monitoring and drug trials. Tensor-based morphometry (TBM) creates maps of these brain changes, visualizing the 3D profile and rates of tissue growth or atrophy, but its sensitivity depends on the contrast and geometric stability of the images. As part of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), 17 normal elderly subjects were scanned twice (at a 2-week interval) with several 3D 1.5 T MRI pulse sequences: high and low flip angle SPGR/FLASH (from which Synthetic T1 images were generated), MP-RAGE, IR-SPGR (N = 10) and MEDIC (N = 7) scans. For each subject and scan type, a 3D deformation map aligned baseline and follow-up scans, computed with a nonlinear, inverse-consistent elastic registration algorithm. Voxelwise statistics, in ICBM stereotaxic space, visualized the profile of mean absolute change and its cross-subject variance; these maps were then compared using permutation testing. Image stability depended on: (1) the pulse sequence; (2) the transmit/receive coil type (birdcage versus phased array); (3) spatial distortion corrections (using MEDIC sequence information); (4) B1-field intensity inhomogeneity correction (using N3). SPGR/FLASH images acquired using a birdcage coil had least overall deviation. N3 correction reduced coil type and pulse sequence differences and improved scan reproducibility, except for Synthetic T1 images (which were intrinsically corrected for B1-inhomogeneity). No strong evidence favored B0 correction. Although SPGR/FLASH images showed least deviation here, pulse sequence selection for the ADNI project was based on multiple additional image analyses, to be reported elsewhere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.013

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Leow, A. D., Klunder, A. D., Jack, C. R., Toga, A. W., Dale, A. M., Bernstein, M. A., Britson, P. J., Gunter, J. L., Ward, C. P., Whitwell, J. L., Borowski, B. J., Fleisher, A. S., Fox, N. C., Harvey, D., Kornak, J., Schuff, N., Studholme, C., Alexander, G. E., Weiner, M. W., & Thompson, P. M.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
627-640
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169212716
Cited by
214
References
8
FWCI
17.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.013
The paper
Leow, A. D., Klunder, A. D., Jack, C. R., Toga, A. W., Dale, A. M., Bernstein, M. A., Britson, P. J., Gunter, J. L., Ward, C. P., Whitwell, J. L., Borowski, B. J., Fleisher, A. S., Fox, N. C., Harvey, D., Kornak, J., Schuff, N., Studholme, C., Alexander, G. E., Weiner, M. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2006). Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.