Cited by 145Free Will and AgencyAction Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and Adaptation

Was it me or was it you? How the sense of agency originates from ideomotor learning revealed by fMRI

Spengler, Stephanie, von Cramon, D. Yves, Brass, Marcel·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

One fundamental property of voluntary action is the feeling of control and causation, also referred to as self agency. Recent research suggests that the sense of agency is based on low-level, sensory-motor control processes, which compare predicted and actual action-effects. Brain imaging research revealed that the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) plays a crucial role for signalling whether a sensory action-consequence matches the prediction or not. However, while it was assumed that sensory outcome predictions are based on ideomotor (action-effect) learning, it has rarely been investigated whether such learning can lead to a sense of agency. In this functional MRI experiment we tested whether a sense of agency develops from learning action-effect associations. In the first part of the experiment, participants learned new action-effect associations. During the following scanning session participants were exposed to matching and non-matching action-effects. In accordance with previous behavioural research, participants reported a decreased sense of agency for non-matching events. As predicted, activity in the TPJ increased with greater incongruence between predicted and actual sensory effects. Furthermore, attributing the causation of sensory events to another person was correlated with activity in fronto-median cortex, a region involved in the representation of intentional agents. This relationship was modulated by the external attribution disposition of the participants. Comp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.047

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spengler, S., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Spengler, Stephanie
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05-15
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
290-298
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976741599
Cited by
145
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
sense of agency, action-effect associations, temporoparietal junction, prediction error, voluntary action, self-control, prefrontal cortex, personality traits
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Internal-External Control, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review