Cited by 403EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeural dynamics and brain function

Signal quality of simultaneously recorded invasive and non-invasive EEG

Open access
Ball, Tonio, Kern, Markus, Mutschler, Isabella, Aertsen, Ad, Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

Both invasive and non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings from the human brain have an increasingly important role in neuroscience research and are candidate modalities for medical brain-machine interfacing. It is often assumed that the major artifacts that compromise non-invasive EEG, such as caused by blinks and eye movement, are absent in invasive EEG recordings. Quantitative investigations on the signal quality of simultaneously recorded invasive and non-invasive EEG in terms of artifact contamination are, however, lacking. Here we compared blink related artifacts in non-invasive and invasive EEG, simultaneously recorded from prefrontal and motor cortical regions using an approach suitable for detection of small artifact contamination. As expected, we find blinks to cause pronounced artifacts in non-invasive EEG both above prefrontal and motor cortical regions. Unexpectedly, significant blink related artifacts were also found in the invasive recordings, in particular in the prefrontal region. Computing a ratio of artifact amplitude to the amplitude of ongoing brain activity, we find that the signal quality of invasive EEG is 20 to above 100 times better than that of simultaneously obtained non-invasive EEG. Thus, while our findings indicate that ocular artifacts do exist in invasive recordings, they also highlight the much better signal quality of invasive compared to non-invasive EEG data. Our findings suggest that blinks should be taken into account in the experimental design of ECoG studies, particularly when event related potentials in fronto-anterior brain regions are analyzed. Moreover, our results encourage the application of techniques for reducing ocular artifacts to further optimize the signal quality of invasive EEG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.028

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ball, T., Kern, M., Mutschler, I., Aertsen, A., & Schulze-Bonhage, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
708-716
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101036104
Cited by
403
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • Volkswagen Foundation (I/83 078)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (51A240-104890)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GQ0420, 0313891)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
invasive EEG, electrocorticography, non-invasive EEG, ocular artifacts, blink artifacts, signal quality, prefrontal cortex, motor cortex, event-related potentials, brain-computer interface
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review