Cited by 111Visual perception and processing mechanismsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Mechanisms underlying decoding at 7 T: ocular dominance columns, broad structures, and macroscopic blood vessels in V1 convey information on the stimulated eye

Open access
Shmuel, Amir, Chaimow, Denis, Raddatz, Guenter, Ugurbil, Kamil, Yacoub, Essa·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that multivariate machine learning algorithms applied to human functional MRI data can decode information segregated in cortical columns, despite the voxel size being large relative to the width of columns. The mechanism by which low spatial resolution imaging decodes information represented in a fine-scale organization is not clear. To investigate mechanisms underlying decoding signals we employed high-resolution gradient-echo BOLD functional MRI of visual area V1. We show that in addition to the fine-scale ocular dominance columns, coarse-scale structures extending over several millimeters also convey discriminative power for decoding the stimulated eye. Discriminative power is conveyed by both macroscopic blood vessels and gray matter regions. We hypothesize that gray-matter regions which drain into specific vessels may preferentially contain ocular-dominance columns biased towards one eye; the bias of a specific region thereby causing a functionally selective ocular-dominance response in the associated vessel. Our findings indicate that coarse-scale structures and macroscopic blood vessels contribute to decoding of the stimulated eye based on low-resolution multivariate data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.040

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This smoothing level improves inter-subject functional alignment, while retaining sensitivity to mesoscopic activity patterns that are consistent across individuals.

    “This smoothing level improves inter-subject functional alignment, while retaining sensitivity to mesoscopic activity patterns that are consistent across individuals [97].”
  • MVPA is more likely to reflect population codes across neurons and has greater sensitivity and specificity to particular types of mental events.

    “MVPA is more likely to reflect population codes across neurons43,45,48, as they have demonstrably greater sensitivity and specificity to particular types of mental events17,31,32.”
  • The smoothing level (8-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel) has been shown to improve inter-subject functional alignment while retaining sensitivity to mesoscopic activity patterns that are consistent across individuals.

    “This smoothing level has been shown to improve inter-subject functional alignment, while retaining sensitivity to mesoscopic activity patterns that are consistent across individuals48,66.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gardner JL, Sun P, Tanaka K, Heeger DJ, Cheng K. (2006) Classification analysis with high spatial resolution fMRI reveals large draining veins with orientation specific responses. Proceedings of the Society for Neuroscience meeting, Atlanta.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shmuel, A., Chaimow, D., Raddatz, G., Ugurbil, K., & Yacoub, E.
Affiliations
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Shmuel, Amir
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
1957-1964
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980209472
Cited by
111
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • National Institutes of Health (P30 NS057091, P41 RR08079, R01-EB000331, R01-MH070800)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
ocular dominance columns, visual area V1, high-resolution fMRI, multivariate decoding, low spatial resolution
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Dominance, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review