Cited by 275Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Against hyperacuity in brain reading: Spatial smoothing does not hurt multivariate fMRI analyses?

Open access
Op de Beeck, Hans P.·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Recently it has been suggested that multivariate analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data can detect high spatial frequency components of cortical signals, like sub-millimeter columns. This 'hyperacuity' seems to be at odds with the common assumption that the fMRI signal has a low spatial resolution due to the spatial spread of the underlying hemodynamic events. To resolve this apparent contradiction, I checked a very straightforward prediction of the hyperacuity hypothesis: if multivariate analyses are picking up a small-scale functional organization, then it can be expected that smoothing will be detrimental to the ability to decode these fine-scale spatial signals. I tested this prediction using data obtained with two paradigms to which multivariate techniques have been applied previously, including the decoding of grating orientation from the pattern of activity in primary visual cortex. It was found that smoothing does not decrease the sensitivity of multivariate analyses. Further simulations in which the scale of cortical organization was known indicate that this effect of smoothing contradicts the idea that the patterns detected with multivariate techniques reflect a fine-scale spatial organization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.047

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smoothing has been shown not to substantially affect information in multivariate data.

    “Although smoothing has been shown not to substantially affect information in multivariate data91–93”
  • The smoothing level (8-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel) has been shown to improve inter-subject functional alignment while retaining sensitivity to mesoscopic activity patterns that are consistent across individuals.

    “This smoothing level has been shown to improve inter-subject functional alignment, while retaining sensitivity to mesoscopic activity patterns that are consistent across individuals48,66.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Friston, K., 2003. Introduction: experimental design and statistical parametric mapping, In: Frackowiak, R.S.J., et al. (Ed.), Human Brain Function, 2nd edition. Academic Press, pp. 599-633.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Op de Beeck, H. P.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
1943-1948
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976734125
Cited by
275
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Vlaamse regering (METH 08/02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
hyperacuity, spatial smoothing, multivariate pattern analysis, primary visual cortex, cortical columns, hemodynamic response
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Visual Cortex, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review