The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shared and selective neural correlates of inhibition, facilitation, and shifting processes during executive control
Open accessAbstract
A network of prefrontal and parietal regions has been implicated in executive control processes. However, the extent to which individual regions within this network are engaged in component control processes, such as inhibition of task-irrelevant stimulus attributes or shifting (switching) between attentional foci, remains controversial. Participants (N=17) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a global-local task in which the global and local levels could facilitate or interfere with one another. Stimuli were presented in blocks in which participants either constantly shifted between the global and local levels, or consistently responded to one level only. Activations related to inhibition and shifting processes were observed in a large network of bilateral prefrontal, parietal, and basal ganglia regions. Region of interest analyses were used to classify each region within this network as being common to inhibition and shifting, or preferential to one component process. Several regions were classified as being preferential to inhibition, including regions within the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, the parietal lobes, and the temporal-parietal junction. A limited set of regions in the parietal lobes and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were classified as preferential to shifting. There was a very large set of regions displaying activation common to both inhibition and shifting processes, including regions within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and basal ganglia. Several of these common regions were also involved during facilitation, suggesting that they are responsive to the number of task-salient channels of information, rather than purely to demands on control processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the brain regions related to bilingual switching are also critical for general attention and cognitive control [97, 98].”
From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [97]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798 · cited 1×
“Several current conceptions of executive control, broadly defined as the organization and manipulation of information in service of goal-oriented behavior, envision multiple component processes, although the parsing of components and their hierarchical organization in the human brain remains controversial (Banich, 200…”
BackgroundAn Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Maldjian, J. A., Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R., & Burdette, J. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00169-1 · Cited by 5,066 · cited 1×
“Anatomical regions were identified using the WFU PickAtlas tool (Maldjian et al., 2004; Maldjian et al., 2003) with a 3-dimensional dilation of 1 voxel.”
MethodThresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate
Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., & Nichols, T. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 · Cited by 4,923
Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception
Navon, D. (1977) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3 · Cited by 4,005
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010 · Cited by 3,197 · cited 2×
“However, the regions that met the strong criterion did not include the right inferior frontal gyrus, a region implicated in inhibition by many prior studies (Aron et al., 2004b).”
Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping
Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W. K., Bellgowan, P. S. F., & Baker, C. I. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2303 · Cited by 2,696
The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101 · Cited by 2,309 · cited 1×
“There may be several possible types of inhibition, each of which may rely on a slightly different set of neural regions (Friedman and Miyake, 2004; Nee et al., 2007).”
BackgroundRole of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation
Thompson‐Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792 · Cited by 2,137 · cited 1×
“In keeping with this possibility, a homologous region in left VLPFC (BA 44) that has been implicated in selection processes also displayed activation during both inhibitory and facilitative processing (Badre et al., 2005; Thompson-Schill et al., 2005; Thompson-Schill et al., 1997).”
BackgroundThe Architecture of Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex
Koechlin, É., Ody, C., & Kouneiher, F. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088545 · Cited by 1,939 · cited 3×
“It remains to be seen how these preferential regions fit within proposed schemes of hierarchical control processes (Banich, 2009; Koechlin et al., 2003) and whether these regions show their component-specific processing in isolation or in conjunction with other regions, in other task domains, or in…”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 · Cited by 1,386
McMorris, T., & Hale, B. J. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.001 · Cited by 516
McRae, K., Jacobs, S. E., Ray, R. D., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.003 · Cited by 486
“Laboratory assessment of set shifting We measured set shifting ability by administering a standard global / local task ( based on Hedden & Gabrieli , 2010 ) .”
MethodLuk, G., Green, D. W., Abutalebi, J., & Grady, C. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.613209 · Cited by 375
“It also plays a role in mediating cortical activation in the ACC and prefrontal regions to enhance switching the focus of attention between stimulus representations (Hedden & Gabrieli, 2010).”
BackgroundMcMorris, T., Sproule, J., Turner, A. P., & Hale, B. J. (2010) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.12.007 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedden, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E.
- Affiliations
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hedden, Trey
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 421-431
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2852172
- OpenAlex
- W1991600003
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central
- Funders
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
- National Institute on Aging (AG021847, F32AG021847)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061426, MH061426)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- executive function, inhibition, attentional shift, facilitation, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, basal ganglia, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, temporoparietal junction, neural correlates
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
