Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 457

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature

Carp, Joshua·2012·NeuroImage

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bennett, 2009, The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging, Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci., 4, 417, 10.1093/scan/nsp053 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Brown, 2007, Risk prediction and aversion by anterior cingulate cortex, Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 7, 266, 10.3758/CABN.7.4.266 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bullmore, 1999, Methods for diagnosis and treatment of stimulus-correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI, Hum. Brain Mapp., 7, 38, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:1<38::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI · Paper page
  4. Carp, 2011, Optimizing the order of operations for movement scrubbing: comment on Power et al., NeuroImage
  5. Chan, 2005, Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals, Lancet, 365, 1159, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71879-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Churchill, 2012, Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI. I. Standard temporal motion and physiological noise correction methods, Hum. Brain Mapp., 33, 609, 10.1002/hbm.21238 · DOI
  7. Churchill, 2012, Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI: 2. Interactions with ICA, PCA, task contrast and inter-subject heterogeneity, PLoS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0031147 · DOI
  8. Dale, 1999, Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI, Hum. Brain Mapp., 8, 109, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<109::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-W · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<109::aid-hbm7>3.0.co;2-w
  9. Della-Maggiore, 2002, An empirical comparison of SPM preprocessing parameters to the analysis of fMRI data, NeuroImage, 17, 19, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1113 · DOI
  10. Egger, 1997, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test, Br. Med. J., 315, 629, 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Friston, 1996, Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series, Magn. Reson. Med., 35, 346, 10.1002/mrm.1910350312 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gronenschild, 2012, The effects of FreeSurfer version, workstation type, and Macintosh operating system version on anatomical volume and cortical thickness measurements, PLoS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0038234 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hayasaka, 2007, Power and sample size calculation for neuroimaging studies by non-central random field theory, NeuroImage, 37, 721, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.009 · DOI
  14. Henson, 1999, The slice-timing problem in event-related fMRI, NeuroImage, 9, 125
  15. Hopfinger, 2000, A study of analysis parameters that influence the sensitivity of event-related fMRI analyses, NeuroImage, 11, 326, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0549 · DOI
  16. Ince, 2012, The case for open computer programs, Nature, 482, 485, 10.1038/nature10836 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ioannidis, 2005, Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 294, 218, 10.1001/jama.294.2.218 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lund, 2005, Motion or activity: their role in intra- and inter-subject variation in fMRI, NeuroImage, 26, 960, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.021 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Mathieu, 2009, Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 302, 977, 10.1001/jama.2009.1242 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Moher, 2010, Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines, PLoS Med., 7, e1000217, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Nieuwenhuis, 2007, Error-likelihood prediction in the medial frontal cortex: a critical evaluation, Cereb. Cortex, 17, 1570, 10.1093/cercor/bhl068 · DOI
  22. Poldrack, 2012, The future of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience, NeuroImage, 2, 1216, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Poline, 2006, Motivation and synthesis of the FIAC experiment: reproducibility of fMRI results across expert analyses, Hum. Brain Mapp., 27, 351, 10.1002/hbm.20268 · DOI
  24. Skudlarski, 1999, ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI: individual subjects, NeuroImage, 9, 311, 10.1006/nimg.1999.0402 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Sladky, 2011, Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI, NeuroImage, 58, 588, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.078 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Tzourio-Mazoyer, 2002, Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain, NeuroImage, 15, 273, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Zhang, 2009, Evaluation and optimization of fMRI single-subject processing pipelines with NPAIRS and second-level CVA, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 27, 264, 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.021 · DOI

Cited by

See all 457

Metadata

Authors
Carp, J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
289-300
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053239079
Cited by
457
References
20
FWCI
25.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Department of Defense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004
The paper
Carp, J. (2012). The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.