Cited by 48Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Simultaneous EEG–fMRI acquisition at low, high and ultra-high magnetic fields up to 9.4T: Perspectives and challenges

Open access
Neuner, Irene, Arrubla, Jorge, Felder, Jörg, Shah, N. Jon·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

In this perspectives article we highlight the advantages of simultaneous acquisition of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). As MRI moves towards using ultra-high magnetic fields in the quest for increased signal-to-noise, the question arises whether combined EEG-fMRI measurements are feasible at magnetic fields of 7 T and higher. We describe the challenges of MRI-EEG at 1.5, 3, 7 and 9.4 T and review the proposed solutions. In an outlook, we discuss further developments such as simultaneous trimodal imaging using MR, positron emission tomography (PET) and EEG under the same physiological conditions in the same subject.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.048

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Debener S., Herrmann C.S. Integration of EEG and fMRI. Editorial. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 67:159-160.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neuner, I., Arrubla, J., Felder, J., & Shah, N. J.
Affiliations
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Corresponding author
Neuner, Irene
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
102
Pages
71-79
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170280958
Cited by
48
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Marie Curie Initial Training Network (MC-ITN) (MC-ITN-238593)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (13N912)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG SH 79/2-2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
simultaneous EEG-fMRI, ultrahigh magnetic fields, 9.4 T, 7 T, 3 T, 1.5 Tesla, signal-to-noise ratio
MeSH terms
Electroencephalography, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Artifacts, Neuroimaging, Magnetic Fields, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review