Cited by 82Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Top-down influence on the visual cortex of the blind during sensory substitution

Open access
Murphy, Matthew C., Nau, Amy C., Fisher, Christopher, Kim, Seong-Gi, Schuman, Joel S., Chan, Kevin C.·2016·NeuroImage

Abstract

Visual sensory substitution devices provide a non-surgical and flexible approach to vision rehabilitation in the blind. These devices convert images taken by a camera into cross-modal sensory signals that are presented as a surrogate for direct visual input. While previous work has demonstrated that the visual cortex of blind subjects is recruited during sensory substitution, the cognitive basis of this activation remains incompletely understood. To test the hypothesis that top-down input provides a significant contribution to this activation, we performed functional MRI scanning in 11 blind (7 acquired and 4 congenital) and 11 sighted subjects under two conditions: passive listening of image-encoded soundscapes before sensory substitution training and active interpretation of the same auditory sensory substitution signals after a 10-minute training session. We found that the modulation of visual cortex activity due to active interpretation was significantly stronger in the blind over sighted subjects. In addition, congenitally blind subjects showed stronger task-induced modulation in the visual cortex than acquired blind subjects. In a parallel experiment, we scanned 18 blind (11 acquired and 7 congenital) and 18 sighted subjects at rest to investigate alterations in functional connectivity due to visual deprivation. The results demonstrated that visual cortex connectivity of the blind shifted away from sensory networks and toward known areas of top-down input. Taken together, our data support the model of the brain, including the visual system, as a highly flexible task-based and not sensory-based machine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.021

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, M. C., Nau, A. C., Fisher, C., Kim, S.-G., Schuman, J. S., & Chan, K. C.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Chan, Kevin C.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
125
Pages
932-940
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2201222263
Cited by
82
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • Université Pierre et Marie Curie
  • Alcon Research Institute
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Texas at Arlington
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
sensory substitution, visual cortex, top-down modulation, blindness, visual rehabilitation, congenital blindness, acquired blindness, auditory imagery, functional connectivity, visual deprivation, cross-modal plasticity, neuroplasticity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blindness, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review