The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity?
Open accessAbstract
While neuroimaging studies typically collapse data from many subjects, brain functional organization varies between individuals, and characterizing this variability is crucial for relating brain activity to behavioral phenotypes. Rest has become the default state for probing individual differences, chiefly because it is easy to acquire and a supposed neutral backdrop. However, the assumption that rest is the optimal condition for individual differences research is largely untested. In fact, other brain states may afford a better ratio of within- to between-subject variability, facilitating biomarker discovery. Depending on the trait or behavior under study, certain tasks may bring out meaningful idiosyncrasies across subjects, essentially enhancing the individual signal in networks of interest beyond what can be measured at rest. Here, we review theoretical considerations and existing work on how brain state influences individual differences in functional connectivity, present some preliminary analyses of within- and between-subject variability across conditions using data from the Human Connectome Project, and outline questions for future study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex
Glasser, M. F., Coalson, T. S., Robinson, E. C., Hacker, C. D., Harwell, J., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K., Andersson, J., Beckmann, C. F., Jenkinson, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18933 · Cited by 5,111
Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity
van den Heuvel, M. P., & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2010) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008 · Cited by 3,326
Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity
Finn, E. S., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., Rosenberg, M. D., Huang, J., Chun, M. M., Papademetris, X., & Constable, R. T. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4135 · Cited by 2,747
Self-citationIntersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision
Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089506 · Cited by 1,839
Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning
Bassett, D. S., Wymbs, N. F., Porter, M. A., Mucha, P. J., Carlson, J. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018985108 · Cited by 1,705
Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior
Barch, D. M., Burgess, G. C., Harms, M. P., Petersen, S. E., Schlaggar, B. L., Corbetta, M., Glasser, M. F., Curtiss, S., Dixit, S., Feldt, C., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.033 · Cited by 1,529
Resting-state fMRI in the human connectome project
Smith, S. M., Beckmann, C. F., Andersson, J., Auerbach, E. J., Bijsterbosch, J., Douaud, G., Duff, E., Feinberg, D. A., Griffanti, L., Harms, M. P., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.039 · Cited by 1,502
Resting-state functional connectivity in neuropsychiatric disorders
Greicius, M. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e328306f2c5 · Cited by 1,180
Efficiency of Functional Brain Networks and Intellectual Performance
van den Heuvel, M. P., Stam, C. J., Kahn, R. S., & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1443-09.2009 · Cited by 1,078
The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates
Birn, R. M., Molloy, E. K., Patriat, R., Parker, T., Meier, T. B., Kirk, G. R., Nair, V. A., Meyerand, M. E., & Prabhakaran, V. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.099 · Cited by 875
Cited by
Gratton, C., Laumann, T. O., Nielsen, A. N., Greene, D. J., Gordon, E. M., Gilmore, A. W., Nelson, S. M., Coalson, R. S., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., et al. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035 · Cited by 846
Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI
Lurie, D. J., Kessler, D., Bassett, D. S., Betzel, R. F., Breakspear, M., Kheilholz, S., Kucyi, A., Liégeois, R., Lindquist, M. A., McIntosh, A. R., et al. (2020) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00116 · Cited by 648
Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging
Scheinost, D., Noble, S., Horien, C., Greene, A. S., Lake, E. M., Salehi, M., Gao, S., Shen, X., O'Connor, D., Barron, D. S., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.057 · Cited by 381
Self-citationSchulz, M.-A., Yeo, B. T. T., Vogelstein, J. T., Mourao-Miranada, J., Kather, J. N., Kording, K., Richards, B., & Bzdok, D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18037-z · Cited by 315
Connectome-based prediction of cocaine abstinence
Yip, S. W., Scheinost, D., Potenza, M. N., & Carroll, K. M. (2019) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17101147 · Cited by 196
Self-citationBrain Modularity: A Biomarker of Intervention-related Plasticity
Gallen, C. L., & D’Esposito, M. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.014 · Cited by 168
Hyon, R., Youm, Y., Kim, J., Chey, J., Kwak, S., & Parkinson, C. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2013606117 · Cited by 57
Popp, J. L., Thiele, J. A., Faskowitz, J., Seguin, C., Sporns, O., & Hilger, K. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08231-4 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Finn, E. S., Scheinost, D., Finn, D. M., Shen, X., Papademetris, X., & Constable, R. T.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 160
- Pages
- 140-151
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2603091313
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
