The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website
Open accessAbstract
The electroencephalogram (EEG) provides a non-invasive, minimally restrictive, and relatively low-cost measure of mesoscale brain dynamics with high temporal resolution. Although signals recorded in parallel by multiple, near-adjacent EEG scalp electrode channels are highly-correlated and combine signals from many different sources, biological and non-biological, independent component analysis (ICA) has been shown to isolate the various source generator processes underlying those recordings. Independent components (IC) found by ICA decomposition can be manually inspected, selected, and interpreted, but doing so requires both time and practice as ICs have no order or intrinsic interpretations and therefore require further study of their properties. Alternatively, sufficiently-accurate automated IC classifiers can be used to classify ICs into broad source categories, speeding the analysis of EEG studies with many subjects and enabling the use of ICA decomposition in near-real-time applications. While many such classifiers have been proposed recently, this work presents the ICLabel project comprised of (1) the ICLabel dataset containing spatiotemporal measures for over 200,000 ICs from more than 6,000 EEG recordings and matching component labels for over 6,000 of those ICs, all using common average reference, (2) the ICLabel website for collecting crowdsourced IC labels and educating EEG researchers and practitioners about IC interpretation, and (3) the automated ICLabel classifier, freely available for MATLAB. The ICLabel classifier improves upon existing methods in two ways: by improving the accuracy of the computed label estimates and by enhancing its computational efficiency. The classifier outperforms or performs comparably to the previous best publicly available automated IC component classification method for all measured IC categories while computing those labels ten times faster than that classifier as shown by a systematic comparison against other publicly available EEG IC classifiers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Self-citationDistilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235
An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Improved Techniques for Training GANs
Salimans, T., Goodfellow, I., Zaremba, W., Cheung, V., Radford, A., & Chen, X. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03498 · Cited by 6,965
BioelectromagnetismPrinciples and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields
Malmivuo, J., & Plonsey, R. (1995) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195058239.001.0001 · Cited by 1,834
Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
Delorme, A., Palmer, J., Onton, J., Oostenveld, R., & Makeig, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030135 · Cited by 810
Self-citationDevelopment of the EEG from 5 months to 4 years of age
Marshall, P. J., Bar-Haim, Y., & Fox, N. A. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00163-3 · Cited by 633
Cited by
Partial recovery of visual function in a blind patient after optogenetic therapy
Sahel, J.-A., Boulanger-Scemama, E., Pagot, C., Arleo, A., Galluppi, F., Martel, J. N., Esposti, S. D., Delaux, A., de Saint Aubert, J.-B., de Montleau, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01351-4 · Cited by 700
Chang, C.-Y., Hsu, S.-H., Pion-Tonachini, L., & Jung, T.-P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2019.2930186 · Cited by 544
Self-citationMoguilner, S., Baez, S., Hernandez, H., Migeot, J., Legaz, A., Gonzalez-Gomez, R., Farina, F. R., Prado, P., Cuadros, J., Tagliazucchi, E., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03209-x · Cited by 128
Chuang, C.-H., Chang, K.-Y., Huang, C.-S., & Jung, T.-P. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119586 · Cited by 88
Billeci, L., Callara, A. L., Guiducci, L., Prosperi, M., Morales, M. A., Calderoni, S., Muratori, F., & Santocchi, E. (2023) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613221082710 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Pion-Tonachini, L., Kreutz-Delgado, K., & Makeig, S.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 198
- Pages
- 181-197
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914237854
- Cited by
- 2,267
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 63.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.026
- The paper
- Pion-Tonachini, L., Kreutz-Delgado, K., & Makeig, S. (2019). ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.