Cited by 103Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Extraction of Distinct Neuronal Cell Types from within a Genetically Continuous Population

Open access
Kim, Euiseok J., Zhang, Zhuzhu, Huang, Ling, Ito-Cole, Tony, Jacobs, Matthew W., Juavinett, Ashley L., Senturk, Gokhan, Hu, Mo +3 more·2020·Neuron

Abstract

Single-cell transcriptomics of neocortical neurons have revealed more than 100 clusters corresponding to putative cell types. For inhibitory and subcortical projection neurons (SCPNs), there is a strong concordance between clusters and anatomical descriptions of cell types. In contrast, cortico-cortical projection neurons (CCPNs) separate into surprisingly few transcriptomic clusters, despite their diverse anatomical projection types. We used projection-dependent single-cell transcriptomic analyses and monosynaptic rabies tracing to compare mouse primary visual cortex CCPNs projecting to different higher visual areas. We find that layer 2/3 CCPNs with different anatomical projections differ systematically in their gene expressions, despite forming only a single genetic cluster. Furthermore, these neurons receive feedback selectively from the same areas to which they project. These findings demonstrate that gene-expression analysis in isolation is insufficient to identify neuron types and have important implications for understanding the functional role of cortical feedback circuits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.04.018

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kim et al. found that long-range connections from visual cortex layer 2/3 neurons correlate not with transcriptomic types but with gene expression differences within types.

    “A recent study showed that long-range connections from visual cortex layer 2/3 neurons do not correlate with transcriptomic types but rather with within-type gene expression differences (Kim et al., 2020).”
  • In mouse primary visual cortex, pyramidal cells projecting to different higher-order visual areas form a continuous transcriptomic population, despite some differentially expressed genes.

    “For example, Retro-seq analysis of mouse primary visual cortical pyramidal cells projecting to different higher-order visual areas form a continuous transcriptomic population, although some differentially expressed genes were detected (Kim et al., 2020).”

    From Single-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes (2021) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ramón y Cajal S, Swanson LW, and Swanson N (1995). Histology of the nervous system of man and vertebrates Cerebellum, midbrain, retina, diencephalon, corpus striatum, cerebral cortex - in general and regional, autonomic system Vol. 2 Vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, E. J., Zhang, Z., Huang, L., Ito-Cole, T., Jacobs, M. W., Juavinett, A. L., Senturk, G., Hu, M., Ku, M., Ecker, J. R., & Callaway, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Callaway, Edward M.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
274-282.e6
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023918693
Cited by
103
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Cancer Institute
  • Brain Research Foundation
  • National Eye Institute
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • Life Sciences Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
single-cell transcriptomics, primary visual cortex, layer 2/3 neurons, cortical feedback, gene expression clusters, mouse visual system
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Feedback, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Rabies virus, Visual Cortex, Gene Expression, Neocortex, Mice, Gene Knock-In Techniques, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review