Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LTP Induction Boosts Glutamate Spillover by Driving Withdrawal of Perisynaptic Astroglia

Open access
Henneberger, Christian, Bard, Lucie, Panatier, Aude, Reynolds, James P., Kopach, Olga, Medvedev, Nikolay I., Minge, Daniel, Herde, Michel K., Anders, Stefanie, Kraev, Igor, Heller, Janosch P., Rama, Sylvain, Zheng, Kaiyu, Jensen, Thomas P., Sanchez-Romero, Inmaculada, Jackson, Colin J., Janovjak, Harald, Ottersen, Ole Petter, Nagelhus, Erlend Arnulf, Oliet, Stephane H.R., Stewart, Michael G., Nägerl, U. Valentin, Rusakov, Dmitri A.·2020·Neuron

Abstract

Extrasynaptic actions of glutamate are limited by high-affinity transporters expressed by perisynaptic astroglial processes (PAPs): this helps maintain point-to-point transmission in excitatory circuits.Memory formation in the brain is associated with synaptic remodeling, but how this affects PAPs and therefore extrasynaptic glutamate actions is poorly understood.Here, we used advanced imaging methods, in situ and in vivo, to find that a classical synaptic memory mechanism, long-term potentiation (LTP), triggers withdrawal of PAPs from potentiated synapses.Optical glutamate sensors combined with patch-clamp and 3D molecular localization reveal that LTP induction thus prompts spatial retreat of astroglial glutamate transporters, boosting glutamate spillover and NMDA-receptor-mediated inter-synaptic cross-talk.The LTP-triggered PAP withdrawal involves NKCC1 transporters and the actin-controlling protein cofilin but does not depend on major Ca 2+ -dependent cascades in astrocytes.We have therefore uncovered a mechanism by which a memory trace at one synapse could alter signal handling by multiple neighboring connections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.030

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 144 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Henneberger, C., Bard, L., Panatier, A., Reynolds, J. P., Kopach, O., Medvedev, N. I., Minge, D., Herde, M. K., Anders, S., Kraev, I., Heller, J. P., Rama, S., Zheng, K., Jensen, T. P., Sanchez-Romero, I., Jackson, C. J., Janovjak, H., Ottersen, O. P., Nagelhus, E. A., Oliet, S. H. R., Stewart, M. G., Nägerl, U. V., & Rusakov, D. A.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
108
Issue
5
Pages
919-936.e11
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087901293
Cited by
267
References
144
FWCI
15.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LTP Induction Boosts Glutamate Spillover by Driving Withdrawal of Perisynaptic Astroglia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.030
The paper
Henneberger, C., Bard, L., Panatier, A., Reynolds, J. P., Kopach, O., Medvedev, N. I., Minge, D., Herde, M. K., Anders, S., Kraev, I., Heller, J. P., Rama, S., Zheng, K., Jensen, T. P., Sanchez-Romero, I., Jackson, C. J., Janovjak, H., Ottersen, O. P., Nagelhus, E. A., . . . Rusakov, D. A. (2020). LTP Induction Boosts Glutamate Spillover by Driving Withdrawal of Perisynaptic Astroglia. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.