CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 408Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An fMRI study of the Trail Making Test

Zakzanis, Konstantine K., Mraz, Richard, Graham, Simon J.·2005·Neuropsychologia
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated the cerebral correlates of the Trail Making Test (TMT), used commonly as a measure of frontal lobe function. Such work sheds additional light on the known shortcomings of the TMT as a localizing instrument, as indicated, for example, by studies of patients with focal brain lesions. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to record brain activity while participants performed the TMT using a custom-built, fiber-optic fMRI-compatible writing device, the "virtual stylus". Unlike in a previous fMRI study that used a verbal adaptation of the TMT, the virtual stylus enabled a closer depiction of the brain regions engaged by the actual paper-and-pencil task. Twelve, right-handed healthy young adults participated. In Part A of the task, participants were required to link in ascending order numbers (1-2-3 ...) that were randomly distributed on a computer screen. In Part B, participants were required to link alternately between numbers and letters (1-A-2-B ...). Although behavioral performance was somewhat less than typically obtained with the TMT due to use of the virtual stylus, distinct left-sided dorsolateral and medial frontal activity was revealed when comparing Part B versus Part A. These findings agree with existing literature showing sensitivity of the TMT to frontal regions in the left hemisphere. However, other activity was also observed (left middle and superior temporal gyrus) reinforcing that the brain-behavior correlations for the TMT are multifaceted and not restricted to the frontal lobe.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.013

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 408

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zakzanis, K. K., Mraz, R., & Graham, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Mraz, Richard
ORCID
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
43
Issue
13
Pages
1878-1886
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.013
OpenAlex
W2051410142
Cited by
408
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
Trail Making Test, frontal lobe function, brain-behavior relationship, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial frontal cortex, left hemisphere, executive function, temporal lobe activation, neuropsychological assessment validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hand, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Reference Values, Serial Learning, Trail Making Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review