Self-esteem modulates dorsal anterior cingulate cortical response in self-referential processing
Abstract
Self-esteem can be defined as evaluations that individuals make about their worth as human beings. These evaluations are in part based on how we evaluate ourselves on our abilities, values, opinions, etc. compared with others or our past or ideal self; and they are also influenced by a thought that what others may think about us. Studies to date investigating the neural mechanisms underlying individual differences in self-esteem have focused mostly on the latter process (i.e. on how self-esteem is associated with neural correlates of processing feedback from others). However, given that people spend a lot of time thinking about themselves and evaluating their worth, we aimed to investigate neural mechanism underlying the association between levels of self-esteem and processing of self-relevant information. Seventeen participants completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan during which they were asked to evaluate whether a given statement is true about them (Self), an acquaintance of theirs (Other), or about general knowledge (Semantic). A whole brain correlational analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between levels of self-esteem and changes in activation of dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus (dACC, BA32) in response to evaluating self-relevant information (Self versus Other contrast). This result extends previous findings implicating this region in the association between processing evaluative feedback and levels of self-esteem and suggests that activity in this region is affected by self-esteem levels also when individuals are engaged in self-referencing and self-evaluation. Future studies should investigate whether these associations are affected differently based on valence of self-evaluations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The medial prefrontal cortex has been shown to be engaged during tasks which require making specific judgments about both one's own traits and those of others.
“The mPFC has been shown to be engaged during tasks which require making specific judgments about both one's own traits and those of others' [Cikara et al., 2014;Kim andJohnson, 2012, 2014;Yang et al., 2012].”
From Oxytocin blurs the self-other distinction during trait judgments and reduces medial prefrontal cortex responses: Oxytocin Blurs Self-Other Distinction (2016) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2012
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126 · see citing works
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · see citing works
Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis
Van Overwalle, F. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20547 · Cited by 1,792 · see citing works
Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.593 · Cited by 1,614 · see citing works
Cortical midline structures and the self
Northoff, G., & Bermpohl, F. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.004 · Cited by 1,446 · see citing works
Neural correlates of self-reflection
Johnson, S. C. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf181 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self
Macrae, C. N. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh025 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
The neural correlates of direct and reflected self-knowledge
Ochsner, K. N., Beer, J. S., Robertson, E. R., Cooper, J. C., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Kihsltrom, J. F., & D'Esposito, M. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.069 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Self-referential reflective activity and its relationship with rest: a PET study
D’Argembeau, A., Collette, F., der Linden, M. V., Laureys, S., Fiore, G. D., Degueldre, C., Luxen, A., & Salmon, É. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.048 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Characterizing Stimulus–Response Functions Using Nonlinear Regressors in Parametric fMRI Experiments
Büchel, C., Holmes, A. P., Rees, G. E., & Friston, K. J. (1998) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0351 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Pruessner, J. C., Baldwin, M. W., Dedovic, K., Renwick, R., Mahani, N. K., Lord, C., Meaney, M., & Lupien, S. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.014 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationOnoda, K., Okamoto, Y., Nakashima, K., Nittono, H., Yoshimura, S., Yamawaki, S., Yamaguchi, S., & Ura, M. (2010) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq002 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
The neural sociometer: brain mechanisms underlying state self-esteem
Eisenberger, N. I., Inagaki, T. K., Muscatell, K. A., Byrne Haltom, K. E., & Leary, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00027 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-esteem modulates medial prefrontal cortical responses to evaluative social feedback
Somerville, L. H., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq049 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Social approval and trait self-esteem
MacDonald, G., Saltzman, J. L., & Leary, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00531-7 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-Esteem and Trait Importance Moderate Cultural Differences in Self-Evaluations
Brown, J. D., & Cai, H. (2009) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022109349509 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhou, H.-X., Chen, X., Shen, Y.-Q., Li, L., Chen, N.-X., Zhu, Z.-C., Castellanos, F. X., & Yan, C.-G. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116287 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
“Similarly, the amPFC and PCC are robustly activated when participants simulate assumed future events related to themselves (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010; Schacter et al., 2008), especially in a naturalistic context which had previously been experienced (Szpunar et al., 2009).”
InfluentialThe neural sociometer: brain mechanisms underlying state self-esteem
Eisenberger, N. I., Inagaki, T. K., Muscatell, K. A., Byrne Haltom, K. E., & Leary, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00027 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Zhao, W., Yao, S., Li, Q., Geng, Y., Ma, X., Luo, L., Xu, L., & Kendrick, K. M. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23190 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Zhao, W., Geng, Y., Luo, L., Zhao, Z., Ma, X., Xu, L., Yao, S., & Kendrick, K. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00272 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, J., Dedovic, K., Chen, W., & Zhang, Q.
- Affiliations
- Southwest University (CN)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Juan
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1267-1270
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069315375
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (30900397)
- Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC (2010BB5001)
- Key Discipline Fund of National 211 Project, China (NSKD11017)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- self-esteem, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, self-referential processing, self-assessment, individual differences, self-relevant information
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review