Cited by 562Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPersonality Traits and PsychologyFace Recognition and Perception

The neural correlates of direct and reflected self-knowledge

Ochsner, Kevin N., Beer, Jennifer S., Robertson, Elaine R., Cooper, Jeffrey C., Gabrieli, John D.E., Kihsltrom, John F., D'Esposito, Mark·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

Socrates said that in order to lead a balanced life one must, "know thyself." In two fMRI experiments, the present study examined the mechanisms mediating two ways in which the self can be known: through direct appraisals (i.e., an individual's own self-beliefs) and reflected appraisals (i.e., an individual's perception of how others view him or her). Experiment 1 examined the common and distinct neural bases of direct appraisals of the self, close others, and normative judgments of trait desirability. All three judgment types activated medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) to a similar degree. Experiment 2 examined the common and distinct neural bases of (1) direct appraisals of self, a close other or a non-close other, and (2) reflected appraisals made from the perspective of a close or a non-close other. Consistent with Experiment 1, all judgment types activated MPFC. Direct appraisals of the self as compared to others more strongly recruited MPFC and right rostrolateral PFC. Direct appraisals as compared to reflected appraisals recruited regions associated with a first-person perspective (posterior cingulate), whereas reflected as compared to direct appraisals recruited regions associated with emotion and memory (insula, orbitofrontal, and temporal cortex). These results support models suggesting that MPFC mediates meta-cognitive processes that may be recruited for direct and reflected self appraisals depending upon the demands of a specific task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.069

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reflecting on one's internal state or on whether trait words apply to oneself increases activation in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, area 24 of MFa.

    “reflecting on one’s internal state (101, 102) or on whether particular trait words apply to oneself (103) increases activation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (area 24 of the MFa).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ochsner, K. N., Beer, J. S., Robertson, E. R., Cooper, J. C., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Kihsltrom, J. F., & D'Esposito, M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Ochsner, Kevin N.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
797-814
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166035904
Cited by
562
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 47
FWCI
15.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32mh066574-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH66574-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
self-knowledge, medial prefrontal cortex, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, metacognition, first-person perspective, emotion and memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cognition, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Personality, Self Concept, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review