Cited by 298Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Differential roles for medial prefrontal and medial temporal cortices in schema-dependent encoding: From congruent to incongruent

Open access
van Kesteren, Marlieke T.R., Beul, Sarah F., Takashima, Atsuko, Henson, Richard N., Ruiter, Dirk J., Fernández, Guillén·2013·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Information that is congruent with prior knowledge is generally remembered better than incongruent information. This effect of congruency on memory has been attributed to a facilitatory influence of activated schemas on memory encoding and consolidation processes, and hypothesised to reflect a shift between processing in medial temporal lobes (MTL) towards processing in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). To investigate this shift, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare brain activity during paired-associate encoding across three levels of subjective congruency of the association with prior knowledge. Participants indicated how congruent they found an object-scene pair during scanning, and were tested on item and associative recognition memory for these associations one day later. Behaviourally, we found a monotonic increase in memory performance with increasing congruency for both item and associative memory. Moreover, as hypothesised, encoding-related activity in mPFC increased linearly with increasing congruency, whereas MTL showed the opposite pattern of increasing encoding-related activity with decreasing congruency. Additionally, mPFC showed increased functional connectivity with a region in the ventral visual stream, presumably related to the binding of visual representations. These results support predictions made by a recent neuroscientific framework concerning the effects of schema on memory. Specifically, our findings show that enhanced memory for more congruent information is mediated by the mPFC, which is hypothesised to guide integration of new information into a pre-existing schema represented in cortical areas, while memory for more incongruent information relies instead on automatic encoding of arbitrary associations by the MTL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.027

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The memory benefits of cognitive schemata are thought to arise from interactions between prefrontal cortex and medial temporal lobe, which support efficient learning of schematically congruent materials.

    “The memory benefits of cognitive schemata are thought to arise from interactions between prefrontal cortex and medial temporal lobe, which support efficient learning of schematically congruent materials [30,31].”

    From Sleep bolsters schematically incongruent memories (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Murre, J. M. (1996). TraceLink: A model of amnesia and consolidation of memory. Hippocampus, 6(6), 675-684.
  2. van Kesteren, M. T., Rijpkema, M., Ruiter, D. J., & Fernandez, G. (2011). How a prior schema affects mnemonic processing. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Memory, York, UK.
  3. Watkins, M. J., & Gardiner, J. M. (1979). Appreciation of generate-recognise theory of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 687-704.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Kesteren, M. T. R., Beul, S. F., Takashima, A., Henson, R. N., Ruiter, D. J., & Fernández, G.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
51
Issue
12
Pages
2352-2359
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120934999
Cited by
298
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
  • Medical Research Council
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (268800)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
schema theory, memory encoding, congruency effect, medial prefrontal cortex, medial temporal lobe, paired-associate learning, recognition memory, associative memory, prior knowledge, ventral stream, functional connectivity, memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Mental Recall, Temporal Lobe, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review