The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature
Abstract
The term "schema" has been used to describe vastly different knowledge structures within the memory neuroscience literature. Ambiguous terminology hinders cross-study comparisons and confounds interpretation of the suggested role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in schema functions. Based on an extensive review of the psychological literature, we propose a framework for distinguishing memory schemas from other knowledge structures. The framework includes a definition of schema as possessing four necessary and sufficient features, and four additional features schemas are sensitive to, which are not required but do play a frequent and central role in schema functions. Necessary schema features are (1) an associative network structure, (2) basis on multiple episodes, (3) lack of unit detail, and (4) adaptability. Features schemas are sensitive to are (5) chronological relationships, (6) hierarchical organization, (7) cross-connectivity, and (8) embedded response options. Additionally, we suggest that vmPFC activity observed in studies of schemas corresponds with participants' coordination of existing schemas with ongoing task demands.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although concepts and categories bear resemblances to schemas (e.g., being acquired gradually and organised in associative networks), their relative fixedness is a direct result of inter-relationships being based on fixed definitions (i.e., the defining features of a category; Ghosh & Gilboa, 2014) and thus they lack the adaptability necessary for higher-level associative processes such as rel”
From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Ghosh & Gilboa, 2014
Citations
Cites
The origins of intelligence in children.
Piaget, J. (1952) · doi:10.1037/11494-000 · Cited by 10,687
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 · Cited by 5,376
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4 · Cited by 4,544
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
(2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446212967.n15 · Cited by 3,749
Retrieval time from semantic memory
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80069-1 · Cited by 3,265
Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading
Barnett, M. A., Singer, H., & Ruddell, R. B. (1987) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326762 · Cited by 3,088
Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures
Hunt, E. B., Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1979) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421499 · Cited by 2,938
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gilboa, 2002, The cognitive neuroscience of confabulation: A review and a model, 315
- Humphreys, 1998, Disordered action schema and action disorganisation syndrome, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 771
- Schank, 1977, vol. 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory
Gilboa, A., & Marlatte, H. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013 · Cited by 742
Self-citationSquire, L. R., Genzel, L., Wixted, J. T., & Morris, R. G. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021766 · Cited by 700
The hippocampus and related neocortical structures in memory transformation
Sekeres, M. J., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (2018) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.05.006 · Cited by 370
Schlichting, M. L., Mumford, J. A., & Preston, A. R. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9151 · Cited by 381
Robin, J., & Moscovitch, M. (2017) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.016 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosh, V. E., & Gilboa, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ghosh, Vanessa E.
- ORCID
- Gilboa, Asaf
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 53
- Pages
- 104-114
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049324847
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- memory schemas, schema theory, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, knowledge structure, associative networks, episodic memory, hierarchy, terminological ambiguity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Memory, Models, Psychological, Terminology as Topic, Prefrontal Cortex, Knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
