Cited by 320Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Interdependence of episodic and semantic memory: evidence from neuropsychology

Open access
GREENBERG, DANIEL L., VERFAELLIE, MIEKE·2010·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Tulving's (1972) theory of memory draws a distinction between general knowledge (semantic memory) and memory for events (episodic memory). Neuropsychological studies have generally examined each type of memory in isolation, but theorists have long argued that these two forms of memory are interdependent. Here we review several lines of neuropsychological research that have explored the interdependence of episodic and semantic memory. The studies show that these forms of memory can affect each other both at encoding and at retrieval. We suggest that theories of memory should be revised to account for all of the interdependencies between episodic and semantic memory; they should also incorporate forms of memory that do not fit neatly into either category.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617710000676

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The construction and elaboration of fictitious scenes, and personal future events, should draw on semantic knowledge.

    “If semantic memory forms a critical component of past episodic retrieval (Levine, 2004;Greenberg and Verfaellie, 2010), and underlies much of internally driven cognition (Binder et al., 2009), it follows that the construction and elaboration of fictitious scenes, and personal future events, should also draw on semantic knowledge (Irish et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GREENBERG, D. L., & VERFAELLIE, M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
GREENBERG, DANIEL L.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2010-06-18
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
748-753
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2160104095
Cited by
320
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Cambridge
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH071783, MH71783)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, semantic memory, memory encoding, memory retrieval, general knowledge, event memory, memory theory
MeSH terms
Humans, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Neuropsychology, Mental Recall, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review