The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced attentional processing during speech perception in adult high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: An ERP-study
Abstract
Deficits in audiovisual speech perception have consistently been detected in patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Especially for patients with a highly functional subtype of ASD, it remains uncertain whether these deficits and underlying neural mechanisms persist into adulthood. Research indicates differences in audiovisual speech processing between ASD and healthy controls (HC) in the auditory cortex. The temporal dynamics of these differences still need to be characterized. Thus, in the present study we examined 14 adult subjects with high-functioning ASD and 15 adult HC while they viewed visual (lip movements) and auditory (voice) speech information that was either superimposed by white noise (condition 1) or not (condition 2). Subject's performance was quantified by measuring stimulus comprehension. In addition, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Results demonstrated worse speech comprehension for ASD subjects compared to HC under noisy conditions. Moreover, ERP-analysis revealed significantly higher P2 amplitudes over parietal electrodes for ASD subjects compared to HC.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In speech-in-noise tasks, high-functioning ASD adults present higher P2 amplitudes (Borgolte et al. 2021).”
From Autism Spectrum Disorder and auditory sensory alterations: a systematic review on the integrity of cognitive and neuronal functions related to auditory processing (2023) · cites this paper as Borgolte et al. 2021
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)
Hu, R. J. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-12-226870-9/01070-4 · Cited by 9,168
Hearing lips and seeing voices
MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264746a0 · Cited by 6,183
Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise
Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907309 · Cited by 2,583
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.809 · Cited by 2,120
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048669 · Cited by 1,262
Robertson, C. E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.112 · Cited by 1,157
Giard, M. H., & Peronnet, F. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563544 · Cited by 1,072
An islet of ability in autistic children: a research note
Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1983) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1983.tb00137.x · Cited by 888
Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech
van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408949102 · Cited by 882
Ross, L. A., Saint‐Amour, D., Leavitt, V. M., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl024 · Cited by 681
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gonçalves, A. M., & Monteiro, P. (2023) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-023-02595-9 · Cited by 88
A systematic review on speech-in-noise perception in autism
Callejo, D. R., & Boets, B. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105406 · Cited by 40
Indoor environment perception of people with autism spectrum condition: A scoping review
Zaniboni, L., & Toftum, J. (2023) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110545 · Cited by 30
Stefaniak, U., Malak, R. E., Mojs, E. H., & Samborski, W. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12030390 · Cited by 11
Deficient Audiovisual Speech Perception in Schizophrenia: An ERP Study
Ghaneirad, E., Saenger, E., Szycik, G. R., Čuš, A., Möde, L., Sinke, C., Wiswede, D., Bleich, S., & Borgolte, A. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13060970 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Borgolte, A., Roy, M., Sinke, C., Wiswede, D., Stephan, M., Bleich, S., Münte, T. F., & Szycik, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Asklepios (DE)
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Borgolte, Anna
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 161
- Pages
- 108022
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3201133405
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MU1311/16-2, MU1311/20-1)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GJ1303A)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, high-functioning autism, audiovisual speech perception, speech understanding, lip reading, P2 component, auditory cortex, autistic adults, event-related potentials
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Humans, Speech, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
