Cited by 1,262Multisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

What you see is what you hear

Shams, Ladan, Kamitani, Yukiyasu, Shimojo, Shinsuke·2000·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35048669

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information from one sensory modality can influence or alter perception of stimuli in another modality.

    “There are various examples of how information from one modality influences, or even alters, our perception of stimuli in another modality (McGurk & McDonald, 1976; Shams, Kamitani, & Shimojo, 2000; Hötting & Röder, 2004)”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Shams, Kamitani, & Shimojo, 2000

  • The temporal binding hypothesis is based on the premise that sensory stimuli that occur in close temporal proximity are more likely to be integrated and perceived as emanating from the same source; timing information is crucial to binding and integrating associated stimuli.

    “It is based on the premise that sensory stimuli that occur in close temporal proximity are more likely to be integrated and perceived as emanating from the same source; thus, timing information is crucial to binding and integrating associated stimuli (Shams et al., 2000, McGurk and Macdonald, 1976, Stevenson et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Shams, Ladan
Venue
Nature
Published
2000-12-14
Volume
408
Issue
6814
Pages
788-788
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2010055427
Cited by
1,262
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 47
FWCI
16.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
multisensory integration, auditory-visual interaction, optical illusions, cross-modal perception, visual perception
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Humans, Optical Illusions, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review