Glucocorticoid receptor activation selectively hampers N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor dependent hippocampal synaptic plasticity in vitro
Abstract
Corticosterone and exposure to stressful experiences have been reported to decrease hippocampal synaptic plasticity, in particular when relatively mild stimulation paradigms-presumably activating predominantly N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors-are being used. Using various stimulation paradigms and pharmacological approaches we tested therefore the hypothesis that elevated corticosterone levels, by activating glucocorticoid receptors, predominantly hamper N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor dependent synaptic plasticity in vitro. To address this, mouse hippocampal slices were treated for 20 min with corticosterone (100 nM) or vehicle and synaptic efficacy was examined 1-6 h later. First, we found that primed burst potentiation and synaptic potentiation after 10 Hz stimulation are predominantly N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor dependent, and are significantly suppressed after corticosterone treatment. Second, these latter effects were prevented by treating slices with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone prior to and during corticosterone administration. Third, theta burst potentiation, which was shown to involve activation of both N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, voltage-dependent calcium channels and possibly other mechanisms, was not affected by corticosterone. However, theta-burst potentiation in the presence of nifedipine-singling out primarily the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor dependent component-was reduced by corticosterone. These results indicate that corticosterone, via glucocorticoid receptor activation, selectively hampers N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor dependent synaptic plasticity in vitro and leaves more complex forms of long term potentiation unaffected. We speculate that these effects are involved in the impairment of cognitive performance by corticosteroid hormones after exposure to stressful and traumatic experiences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When the hippocampus is in a phase 2 state, it shifts to non-NMDA receptor-, rather than NMDA-receptor-, dependent LTP.
“Additional support for this speculation is the finding that when the hippocampus is in a phase 2 state, it shifts to non-NMDA receptor-, rather than NMDA-receptor-, dependent LTP (Krugers et al. [155]; Wiegert et al. [156]).”
From The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law (2007) · cites this paper as Wiegert et al. [156]
Cites
Stress and glucocorticoids impair retrieval of long-term spatial memory
de Quervain, D. J.-F., Roozendaal, B., & McGaugh, J. L. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29542 · Cited by 1,182 · see citing works
Conrad, C. D., Magariños, A. M., LeDoux, J. E., & McEwen, B. S. (1999) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.113.5.902 · Cited by 664 · see citing works
Exposing Rats to a Predator Blocks Primed Burst Potentiation in the Hippocampus<i>In Vitro</i>
Mesches, M. H., Fleshner, M., Heman, K. L., Rose, G. M., & Diamond, D. M. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-14-j0004.1999 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Alfarez, D. N., Joëls, M., & Krugers, H. J. (2003) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02622.x · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Self-citationLong-term potentiation and memory
Morris, R. G. M. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1230 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Diamond, D. M., Park, C. R., & Woodson, J. C. (2004) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.10186 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diamond, D. M., Campbell, A. M., Park, C. R., Halonen, J., & Zoladz, P. R. (2007) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2007/60803 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
“[156]) and can impair hippocampus-specific memory processing in rats (de Quervain et al.”
BackgroundChampagne, D. L., Bagot, R. C., van Hasselt, F., Ramakers, G., Meaney, M. J., de Kloet, E. R., Joels, M., & Krugers, H. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0526-08.2008 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Self-citationBagot, R. C., van Hasselt, F. N., Champagne, D. L., Meaney, M. J., Krugers, H. J., & Joëls, M. (2009) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2009.03.004 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Self-citationStress hormones and AMPA receptor trafficking in synaptic plasticity and memory
Krugers, H. J., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Groc, L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2913 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationTime-dependent corticosteroid modulation of prefrontal working memory processing
Henckens, M. J. A. G., van Wingen, G. A., Joëls, M., & Fernández, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019128108 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationGlucocorticoid impairs mitochondrial quality control in neurons
Choi, G. E., & Han, H. J. (2021) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105301 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Dynamically changing effects of corticosteroids on human hippocampal and prefrontal processing
Henckens, M. J. A. G., Pu, Z., Hermans, E. J., van Wingen, G. A., Joëls, M., & Fernández, G. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21409 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationTamano, H., Fukura, K., Suzuki, M., Sakamoto, K., Yokogoshi, H., & Takeda, A. (2013) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.02.005 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Takeda, A., Tamano, H., Suzuki, M., Sakamoto, K., Oku, N., & Yokogoshi, H. (2012) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s10571-011-9732-z · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wiegert, O., Pu, Z., Shor, S., Joëls, M., & Krugers, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Wiegert, O.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 403-411
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075503589
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- glucocorticoid receptor, corticosterone, NMDA receptor, hippocampal synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, mifepristone, nifedipine, voltage-gated calcium channels, stress, cognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Calcium Channel Blockers, Corticosterone, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Drug Interactions, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Hormone Antagonists, Male, Membrane Potentials, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuronal Plasticity, Nifedipine, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Valine, Mifepristone, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mice, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review