Cited by 79Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

Total number of cells in the human newborn telencephalic wall

Larsen, C.C., Bonde Larsen, K., Bogdanovic, N., Laursen, H., Græm, N., Badsberg Samuelsen, G., Pakkenberg, B.·2006·Neuroscience

Abstract

The total cell numbers were estimated in the neocortical part of the human telencephalon in 10 normal brains of newborn babies within four major developmental zones: the cortical plate/marginal zone, the subplate, the intermediate zone and the ventricular/subventricular zone. Furthermore, the total number of neuron and glial cells was estimated in the cortical plate. The gestational ages ranged from 38 + 0-42 + 5 weeks + days of gestation. The mean total cell number was 32.6 x 10(9) (coefficient of error = 0.04) and the total number of neurons in the cortical plate 19.8 x 10(9) (coefficient of error = 0.06). This indicates that the total number of neocortical neurons equals the total number in the adults, which, however, is not the case for the glial cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.01.005

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adult neocortical neuron numbers are attained at around the time of birth in humans.

    “because adult neocortical neuron numbers are attained at around the time of birth in humans”
  • The tremendous growth of the human neocortex during postnatal development is due to elaboration of dendritic arbors and a 4-fold increase in glial cell numbers.

    “the tremendous growth of the neocortex during postnatal development is due to elaboration of dendritic arbors and a 4-fold increase in glial cell numbers (13, 14).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larsen, C. C., Bonde Larsen, K., Bogdanovic, N., Laursen, H., Græm, N., Badsberg Samuelsen, G., & Pakkenberg, B.
Affiliations
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
Corresponding author
Larsen, C.C.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
139
Issue
3
Pages
999-1003
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068291669
Cited by
79
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 35 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
telencephalon, neocortex, cell number estimation, cortical plate, subplate, intermediate zone, subventricular zone, neuron number, gestational age, brain development
MeSH terms
Cell Count, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Neuroglia, Neurons, Telencephalon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review