The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501 · Cited by 3,953
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517 · cited 4×
“Individuals low in NFC tend to be influenced by simple and peripheral cues in persuasion settings, whereas individuals high in NFC think more carefully about the substantive information in these settings (Cacioppo et al., 1996).”
InfluentialWhat is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
Hollis, S., & Campbell, F. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670 · Cited by 2,160
Cited by
Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction
Liedtka, J. (2015) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12163 · Cited by 951
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318755303 · Cited by 173
Informal workplace learning: development and validation of a measure
Decius, J., Schaper, N., & Seifert, A. (2019) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21368 · Cited by 127
Instructors as Innovators: A future-focused approach to new AI learning opportunities, with prompts
Mollick, E., & Mollick, L. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.05181 · Cited by 75
Wong, I. H. M., & Wong, T. T. Y. (2021) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102012 · Cited by 59
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., & Zornoza, A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12449 · Cited by 47
Hoskins, S. G., Gottesman, A. J., & Kenyon, K. L. (2017) · Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v18i3.1365 · Cited by 9
Becker, F., Wirzberger, M., Pammer-Schindler, V., Srinivas, S., & Lieder, F. (2023) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.16 · Cited by 6
Baumann, M., & Handrock, A. (2019) · The Bright Side of Shame · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13409-9_19
Metadata
- Authors
- Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-35
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113038742
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
