CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 230Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisSmoking Behavior and Cessation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cigarette Smoking and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the EUREYE Study

Chakravarthy, U., Augood, C., Bentham, G.C., de Jong, P.T.V.M., Rahu, M., Seland, J., Soubrane, G., Tomazzoli, L., Topouzis, F., Vingerling, J.R., Vioque, J., Young, I.S., Fletcher, A.E.·2007·Ophthalmology
DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To examine the association between cigarette smoking and age-related maculopathy (ARM) including age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the European population.Design Cross-sectional study.Participants Four thousand seven hundred fifty randomly sampled > or =65-year-olds from 7 study centers across Europe (Norway, Estonia, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Greece, and Spain).Methods Participants underwent an eye examination and digital retinal photography. The images were graded at a single center. Smoking history was ascertained by a structured questionnaire administered by trained fieldworkers. Multinomial and binary logistic regressions were used to examine the association between smoking history and ARM grade and type of AMD, taking account of potential confounders and the multicenter study design.Main outcome measures Photographic images were graded according to the International Classification System for ARM and stratified using the Rotterdam staging system into 5 exclusive stages (ARM 0-3 and ARM 4, also known as AMD). Age-related macular degeneration also was classified as neovascular AMD or geographic atrophy (GA).Results One hundred fifty-eight cases were categorized as AMD (109 neovascular AMD and 49 GA); 2260 had no signs of ARM (ARM 0). Current smokers had increased odds of neovascular AMD (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-4.8) or GA (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.1-11.1), whereas for ex-smokers the odds were around 1.7. Compared with people with unilateral AMD, those with bilateral AMD were more likely to have a history of heavy smoking in the previous 25 years (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.3-20.0). The attributable fraction for AMD due to smoking was 27% (95% CI, 19%-33%). There was no consistent association with ARM grades 1 to 3 and smoking.Conclusions These findings highlight the need for increasing public awareness of the risks associated with smoking and the benefit of quitting smoking. Patients with unilateral disease who are current smokers should be advised of the risk of second-eye disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.022

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–230 of 230

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chakravarthy, U., Augood, C., Bentham, G. C., de Jong, P. T. V. M., Rahu, M., Seland, J., Soubrane, G., Tomazzoli, L., Topouzis, F., Vingerling, J. R., Vioque, J., Young, I. S., & Fletcher, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • National Institute for Health Development (EE)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Fletcher, A.E.
ORCID
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
114
Issue
6
Pages
1157-1163
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.022
OpenAlex
W1966367482
Cited by
230
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
cigarette smoking, age-related macular degeneration, age-related maculopathy, neovascular AMD, geographic atrophy, smoking cessation, attributable fraction, older adults, risk factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environment, Europe, Female, Humans, Life Style, Macular Degeneration, Male, Photography, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Odds Ratio, Smoking Cessation, Choroidal Neovascularization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review