Cited by 126Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingCancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer Studies

The roles of hope and optimism on posttraumatic growth in oral cavity cancer patients

Ho, Samuel, Rajandram, Rama Krsna, Chan, Natalie, Samman, Nabil, McGrath, Colman, Zwahlen, Roger Arthur·2011·Oral Oncology

Abstract

To investigate the association of the positive coping strategies, hope and optimism, on posttraumatic growth (PTG) in oral cavity (OC) cancer patients. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted and performed in the outpatient station of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China. Fifty patients successfully treated for OC cancer were recruited after their informed consents had been obtained during the review clinic. During their regular follow-up controls in the outpatient clinic, the patients compiled the posttraumatic growth inventory (PTGI) questionnaire, hope scale (HS) and the life orientation scale-revised (LOT-R). Hope and optimism correlated significantly positive with PTG and accounting together for a 25% variance of posttraumatic growth. Hope positively correlated with posttraumatic growth (r=.49, p<.001) as well as optimism (r=.31, p<.05). When compared to unmarried patients, married patients showed high levels of PTG and hope (married participants: mean=53.15, SD=11.04; unmarried participants: mean=41.00, SD=6.36; t (48)=2.403, p<.05). Hope and optimism represent important indicators for PTG in OC cancer patients. An intact dyad relationship seems to be important for hope and consecutive higher levels of PTG when compared to unmarried patients. Supportive psychological treatment strategies related to these two coping factors might be beneficial for OC cancer patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.11.015

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, S., Rajandram, R. K., Chan, N., Samman, N., McGrath, C., & Zwahlen, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Zwahlen, Roger Arthur
Venue
Oral Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
121-124
ISSN
1368-8375 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049810544
Cited by
126
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oral Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, hope, optimism, oral cancer, coping strategies, marital status, dyads, psychological support, cancer patients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review