Cited by 19Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

A longitudinal investigation of posttraumatic growth and its associated factors among head and neck cancer survivors

Hamdan, Nur Amirah, Abd Hamid, Norhaliza, Leong Bin Abdullah, Mohammad Farris Iman·2022·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Posttraumatic growth (PTG) may improve well‐being among cancer survivors, but a longitudinal study addressing head and neck cancer (HNC) is lacking. This longitudinal study examined PTG trends and determined the associations of physical symptoms and complications, as well as sociodemographic and tumor characteristics on PTG over time among HNC survivors. Methods Participants completed the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer's “Quality of Life Questionnaire—Head and Neck 35” module (EORTC‐QLQ‐H&N‐35) and “Posttraumatic Growth Inventory—Short Form” (PTGI‐SF) during baseline ( T 1 ) and follow‐up ( T 2 ; 5–7 months post‐baseline) assessments. Results In total, 200 HNC participants completed the study and 67.5% of them reported increasing PTG. Physical symptoms and complications that were significantly associated with lower PTG included problems with social contact and the senses. Meanwhile, sociodemographic variables that were significantly associated with PTG were gender (males had lower PTG than females) and religion (Muslims and Buddhists had higher PTG than participants of other religious faith). Conclusion Our findings revealed the need to focus on the impact of sensory issues and reduced social contact following HNC on PTG which may be addressed by various restorative and supportive rehabilitation therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5835

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamdan, N. A., Abd Hamid, N., & Leong Bin Abdullah, M. F. I.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • Lifestyle Science Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute Universiti Sains Malaysia Kepala Batas Pulau Pinang Malaysia
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-19
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
504-511
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W3206741415
Cited by
19
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, head and neck cancer survivors, cancer survivorship, sensory disturbances, social contact, gender differences, religious affiliation, quality of life, longitudinal trends
MeSH terms
Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological, Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Quality of Life, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review