Cited by 61Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Posttraumatic growth in head and neck cancer survivors: is it possible and what are the correlates?

Open access
Sharp, Linda, Redfearn, Devon, Timmons, Aileen, Balfe, Myles, Patterson, Joanne·2018·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Posttraumatic growth (PTG) is a possible positive consequence of a traumatic event, such as cancer. Head and neck cancer (HNC) may be particularly traumatic, given its adverse effects on functional, psychological, and social wellbeing. We investigated the extent of PTG, factors associated with PTG, and associations between PTG and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in HNC survivors. METHODS: HNC survivors (ICD10 C00-C14, C32), identified from the population-based National Cancer Registry Ireland, completed a postal survey. PTG was assessed using the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTG-I) and HRQoL with FACT-G and FACT-H&N. Associations between socio-economic characteristics, social support, and clinical variables and PTG were examined using multivariable linear regression. Total HRQoL scores were compared in those with none-low PTG vs moderate-high PTG. RESULTS: A total of 583 survivors participated (response rate = 59%). The mean PTG score was 55.74 (95%CI 53.15-58.33); 60% had moderate-high PTG. Survivors scored highest in the PTG-I domain appreciation of life. In multivariable analysis, being female, being younger, having more social support, and having cancer-related financial stress were significantly associated with more PTG. HRQoL was significantly higher in those with moderate-high than no-little PTG (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: A notable proportion of HNC survivors report PTG but growth is, on average, lower than reported for other cancers. Nonetheless, higher PTG appears related to better HRQoL. Further research would be valuable to understand the pathways by which HNC may lead to PTG and inform development of strategies to support and encourage PTG in this survivor population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4682

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharp, L., Redfearn, D., Timmons, A., Balfe, M., & Patterson, J.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • National Cancer Registry (IE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Linda
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-16
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1517-1523
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2792979132
Cited by
61
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Health Research Board (HRA/2009/262)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, head and neck cancer survivors, health-related quality of life, social support, gender differences, age differences, appreciation of life, cancer survivorship
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Ireland, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review