Cited by 511Mining and Resource ManagementGeology and Environmental Impact StudiesMining Techniques and Economics

Global trends and environmental issues in nickel mining: Sulfides versus laterites

Mudd, Gavin M.·2010·Ore Geology Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2010.05.003

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mudd, G. M.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Mudd, Gavin M.
Venue
Ore Geology Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
38
Issue
1-2
Pages
9-26
ISSN
0169-1368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087468438
Cited by
511
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
37.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ore Geology Reviews (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Resources Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Mining Techniques and Economics
Keywords
nickel mining, nickel sulfide ores, laterite ore, ore grade, Sudbury Basin, mining impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, climate change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review