Cited by 29Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersMind wandering and attention

Are there specific meta-cognitions associated with vulnerability to symptoms of worry and obsessional thoughts?

de Bruin, Gwendolijn Olivia, Muris, Peter, Rassin, Eric·2007·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.015

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Bruin, G. O., Muris, P., & Rassin, E.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
689-699
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049185726
Cited by
29
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
metacognition, meta-worry, thought suppression, cognitive self-consciousness, obsessional thoughts, worry, intrusive thoughts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review