Cited by 281Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMind wandering and attentionMemory Processes and Influences

Individual differences in thought suppression. The White Bear Suppression Inventory: Factor structure, reliability, validity and correlates

Muris, Peter, Merckelbach, Harald, Horselenberg, Robert·1996·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The White Bear Suppression Inventory [WBSI; Wegner, D.M. & Zanakos, S. (1994), Journal of Personality, 62, 615-640] is a self-report questionnaire measuring people's general tendency to suppress unwanted negative thoughts. The current article describes two studies investigating the reliability, factor structure, validity, and correlates of the WBSI. Study 1 (n = 172) showed that the WBSI is a reliable instrument in terms of internal consistency and test-retest stability. Factor analyses of the WBSI revealed a 1-factor solution. Furthermore, the WBSI was found to correlate positively with measures of emotional vulnerability and psychopathological symptoms. In Study 2 (n = 40), the relationship between WBSI and levels of intrusive thinking was examined in more detail, using a thought suppression task. In general, results of this thought suppression experiment provided evidence for the validity of the WBSI. That is, subjects with high WBSI scores exhibited higher frequencies of unwanted intrusive thoughts than subjects with low WBSI scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00005-8

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., & Horselenberg, R.
Corresponding author
Muris, Peter
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-05
Volume
34
Issue
5-6
Pages
501-513
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003939947
Cited by
281
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
thought suppression, White Bear Suppression Inventory, intrusive thoughts, individual differences, emotional vulnerability, psychiatric symptoms, factor structure, reliability statistics, validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Individuality, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Repression, Psychology, Thinking, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review