The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The construct of impulsivity revisited
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Leshem and Glicksohn (2007) likewise report a significant decline in impulsivity from ages 14-16 to 20-22 on both the Eysenk and Barratt impulsiveness scales.”
From A dual systems model of adolescent risk‐taking (2010) · cites this paper as Leshem and Glicksohn (2007)
In the citing paper
“To date, studies examining age differences in self-reported impulsivity—both cross-sectional (Leshem and Glicksohn, 2007, Steinberg et al., 2008) and longitudinal (Harden and Tucker-Drob, 2011)—find that impulsivity decreases with age across the second decade of life.”
From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Leshem and Glicksohn, 2007
Citations
Cites
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00064-7 · Cited by 4,123
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116
Neuropsychological assessment.
Cipolotti, L., & Warrington, E. K. (1995) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.58.6.655 · Cited by 3,267
Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428104263675 · Cited by 3,104
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual – Revised and Expanded
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, C., Talley, J., Kay, G., & Curtiss, G. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,975
Evenden, J. L. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/pl00005481 · Cited by 2,044
FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model
Lorenzo‐Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192753 · Cited by 1,325
Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults
Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G., & Allsopp, J. F. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90011-x · Cited by 1,163
Executive Functioning as a Potential Mediator of Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Normal Adults.
Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., & Berish, D. E. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.566 · Cited by 1,057
Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures
Reynolds, B. A., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.024 · Cited by 947
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lipperman-Kreda, S., & Glicksohn, J. (in review). Brief report: Personality and cognitive-style profile of antisocial and prosocial adolescents.
- Werner, 1978, The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view, vol. 1, 107
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012955 · Cited by 1,542
Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting
Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01244.x · Cited by 1,237
A dual systems model of adolescent risk‐taking
Steinberg, L. (2010) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20445 · Cited by 1,187
The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010 · Cited by 867
“To date, studies examining age differences in self-reported impulsivity—both cross-sectional (Leshem and Glicksohn, 2007; Steinberg et al., 2008) and longitudinal (Harden and Tucker-Drob, ING ModelD 8 ogniti 2 d b o v s f l Q s s f 5 r i o 2 ( c r a s t c t 1 2 2 d h s c c a s t i ( i t r i t r m n…”
Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis.
Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021591 · Cited by 866
Metadata
- Authors
- Leshem, R., & Glicksohn, J.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Leshem, Rotem
- Glicksohn, Joseph
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 681-691
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057484050
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- impulsivity, construct validity, trait impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity, age differences, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Matching Familiar Figures Test, Porteus Maze Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, adolescents, young adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
