Cited by 106Personality Traits and PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The construct of impulsivity revisited

Leshem, Rotem, Glicksohn, Joseph·2007·Personality and Individual Differences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.015

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lipperman-Kreda, S., & Glicksohn, J. (in review). Brief report: Personality and cognitive-style profile of antisocial and prosocial adolescents.
  2. Werner, 1978, The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view, vol. 1, 107

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leshem, R., & Glicksohn, J.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Leshem, Rotem
  • Glicksohn, Joseph
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
681-691
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057484050
Cited by
106
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
impulsivity, construct validity, trait impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity, age differences, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Matching Familiar Figures Test, Porteus Maze Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, adolescents, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review