Cited by 146Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Patience is a virtue: cooperative people have lower discount rates

Open access
Curry, Oliver S., Price, Michael E., Price, Jade G.·2008·Personality and Individual Differences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.023

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impulsivity and competitive attitudes should decrease willingness to engage in long-term cooperation and altruism.

    “Impulsivity and competitive attitudes, in turn, should decrease the willingness to engage in long-term cooperation and to behave altruistically (Belsky et al., 1991; Curry et al., 2008);”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Curry et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harris, A. C. (2001). Delay discounting and performance on the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 19(2).
  2. Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92(1).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curry, O. S., Price, M. E., & Price, J. G.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Curry, Oliver S.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
780-785
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085852579
Cited by
146
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Santa Fe Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
reciprocal altruism, patience, discount rate, time preference, cooperation, public goods, intertemporal choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review