Cited by 56Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Traits and Psychology

The structure and reliability of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire

Dickie, Liza, Surgenor, Lois J., Wilson, Marc, McDowall, John·2012·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.003

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickie, L., Surgenor, L. J., Wilson, M., & McDowall, J.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Surgenor, Lois J.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
865-869
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002898235
Cited by
56
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
clinical perfectionism, construct validity, reliability statistics, factor structure, two-factor model, evaluative concerns, personal standards, young adults, undergraduate students, test-retest reliability, internal consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review