CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 433Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing complex models with small sample sizes: A historical overview and empirical demonstration of what Partial Least Squares (PLS) can offer differential psychology

Willaby, Harold W., Costa, Daniel S.J., Burns, Bruce D., MacCann, Carolyn, Roberts, Richard D.·2015·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.008

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chin, 1998, Issues and opinions on structural equation modelling, MIS Quarterly, 22, 7
  2. Jöreskog, 1982, Vol. 139

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–433 of 433

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Willaby, H. W., Costa, D. S. J., Burns, B. D., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Professional Examination Service (US)
Corresponding author
Willaby, Harold W.
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
84
Pages
73-78
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.008
OpenAlex
W1985977391
Cited by
419
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
partial least squares path modeling, structural equation modeling, small sample size, differential psychology, mediation model, formative constructs, model fit, complex models, sample size requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review