Cited by 9Personality Traits and PsychologyAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Attachment, perceived parental trust and grandiose narcissism: Moderated mediation models

Zhang, Qingyao, Zhang, Lijuan, Li, Caina·2017·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.013

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Q., Zhang, L., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
  • North Minzu University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Caina
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
104
Pages
470-475
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520610616
Cited by
9
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Social Science Foundation of China (15BRK018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
attachment, grandiose narcissism, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, self-enhancement, self-protection, admiration, rivalry, junior high school students, moderated mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review