Cited by 759Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Interpersonal Analysis of Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism

Dickinson, Kelly A., Pincus, Aaron L.·2003·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

This article examines the validity of grandiose and vulnerable subtypes of narcissistic character styles through an analysis of personality disorder criteria, interpersonal problems, and adult attachment styles in a nonclinical population. The grandiose personalities in this sample were rated high in the dramatic traits associated with narcissistic, antisocial, and histrionic personality disorders based on a diagnostic interview, and they reported domineering and vindictive interpersonal problems. However, despite the observation of narcissistic personality pathology, they denied interpersonal distress related to their interpersonal problems and the majority reported adult attachment styles reflective of positive self-representations (Secure, Dismissive). Vulnerable narcissistic individuals were represented by high ratings on avoidant personality disorder based on a diagnostic interview. They reported high interpersonal distress and greater domineering, vindictive, cold, and socially avoidant interpersonal problems. The majority reported adult attachment styles reflective of negative self-representations (Fearful, Preoccupied). The validity of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism based upon the results of this study was discussed in terms of clinical theory and with reference to the implications of two subtypes of narcissism for diagnosis and treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
2003-06
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
188-207
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127863831
Cited by
759
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, interpersonal problems, adult attachment styles, avoidant personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, self-representation, non-clinical population, personality disorder diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Narcissism, Object Attachment, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review