Cited by 40Personality Traits and PsychologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and Treatments

A compensatory model to understand dysfunctional personality traits in problematic gaming: The role of vulnerable narcissism

Di Blasi, Maria, Giardina, Alessandro, Lo Coco, Gianluca, Giordano, Cecilia, Billieux, Joel, Schimmenti, Adriano·2020·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109921

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Blasi, M., Giardina, A., Lo Coco, G., Giordano, C., Billieux, J., & Schimmenti, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
160
Pages
109921
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008015180
Cited by
40
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
gaming addiction, vulnerable narcissism, grandiose narcissism, emotional dysregulation, escapism, play motivation, MMORPG, World of Warcraft, compensatory model, personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review