Cited by 270Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Pain-related fear and daily functioning in patients with osteoarthritis

Heuts, Peter H.T.G, Vlaeyen, Johan W.S, Roelofs, Jeffrey, de Bie, Rob A, Aretz, Karin, van Weel, Chris, van Schayck, Onno C.P·2004·Pain

Abstract

There is growing evidence supporting the relationship between pain-related fear and functional disability in chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. In osteoarthritis (OA) patients the role of pain-related fear and avoidance has received little research attention so far. The present study investigates the degree to which pain-related fear, measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), influences daily functioning in OA patients. The purpose of the present paper was twofold: (1) to investigate the factor structure of the TSK in a sample of OA patients by means of confirmatory factor analysis; and (2) to investigate the role of pain-related fear in OA compared to other factors, such as radiological findings and level of pain intensity. The results show that TSK consists of two factors, called 'activity avoidance' and 'somatic focus', which is in line with other studies in low back pain and fibromyalgia. Furthermore, pain-related fear occurred to a considerable extent in this sample of osteoarthritis patients and was negatively associated with daily functioning. Level of pain and level of pain-related fear were significantly associated with functional limitations. Radiological findings were not significant predictors and when compared to pain-related fear they were not significant. These findings underscore the importance of pain-related fear in daily functioning of OA patients. Therefore, treatment strategies aiming at reduction of pain-related fear in OA patients nee…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.035

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heuts, P. H. T. G., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Roelofs, J., de Bie, R. A., Aretz, K., van Weel, C., & van Schayck, O. C. P.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Heuts, Peter H.T.G
Venue
Pain
Published
2004-07
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
228-235
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158531919
Cited by
270
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Maastricht
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
osteoarthritis, fear of pain, kinesiophobia, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, daily functioning, functional disability, activity avoidance, somatic focus, factor structure, pain intensity, radiographic findings
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Pain, Pain Measurement, Radiography, Regression Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review