Cited by 64Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The influence of fear of movement and pain catastrophizing on daily pain and disability in individuals with acute whiplash injury: a daily diary study

Open access
Vangronsveld, Karoline L.H., Peters, Madelon, Goossens, Mariëlle, Vlaeyen, Johan·2008·Pain

Abstract

Previous research supports the fear-avoidance model in explaining the transition from acute to chronic non-specific musculoskeletal pain. However, there is still little knowledge on when this vicious circle of pain, disability, pain catastrophizing and fear of movement starts. We performed a daily diary study in 42 patients with acute whiplash injury. Pain, disability, pain catastrophizing and fear of movement were measured on a daily basis with paper diaries for 21 consecutive days. Most participants showed a decline in pain and disability from day 1 to day 21 and this was paralleled by a decline in the fear of movement and pain catastrophizing. Multilevel analyses showed that both between and within persons, high levels of pain catastrophizing and fear of movement are associated with more pain and disability. Moreover, the fear of movement was also predictive of pain and disability on the following day. We also examined the reverse association, that is, whether the changes in pain predict changes in the next day's fear of movement and pain catastrophizing. Although for the fear of movement the model reached significance, the amount of explained variance was negligible. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that already in the early stages of whiplash-related complaints, significant associations between fear of movement and pain intensity and disability occur, and that this association may be predictive of the persistence of pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2008.05.019

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vangronsveld, K. L. H., Peters, M., Goossens, M., & Vlaeyen, J.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Vangronsveld, Karoline L.H.
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-10-15
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
449-457
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160414268
Cited by
64
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
whiplash injury, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance model, daily pain, disability, acute pain, pain persistence
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Belgium, Disability Evaluation, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Movement, Pain, Risk Factors, Whiplash Injuries, Comorbidity, Incidence, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review