Cited by 46Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of duloxetine in Japanese fibromyalgia patients

Open access
Murakami, Masato, Osada, Kenichi, Mizuno, Hiromichi, Ochiai, Toshimitsu, Alev, Levent, Nishioka, Kusuki·2015·Arthritis Research & Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fibromyalgia is characterized by widespread pain and is often accompanied by accessory symptoms. There are limited treatment options for this condition in Japan. Therefore, we conducted a phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in Japanese patients with fibromyalgia. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted in Japan. Outpatients who met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for fibromyalgia and whose Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain score was ≥4 were randomized to duloxetine 60 mg or placebo once daily for 14 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the change in the BPI average pain score from baseline. Secondary efficacy, quality of life (QoL), and safety outcomes were also evaluated. Mixed-effects model repeated-measures (MMRM) analysis and last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis of covariance were used to evaluate the primary efficacy measure. RESULTS: Overall, 393 patients were randomized to receive either duloxetine (n = 196) or placebo (n = 197). The MMRM analysis revealed no significant difference between duloxetine and placebo regarding the change in BPI average pain scores at week 14. Based on LOCF analysis, a statistically significant improvement in the change in BPI average pain scores at week 14 was observed for patients treated with duloxetine compared with placebo. Duloxetine treatment was associated with improved outcomes in nearly all secondary and post hoc analyses. The treatment was generally well tolerated. Somnolence, nausea, and constipation were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the duloxetine group. The discontinuation rates due to treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the MMRM analysis did not demonstrate superiority of duloxetine over placebo, duloxetine treatment was associated with improved outcomes in secondary and post hoc analyses of the mean change in the BPI average pain score and most of the secondary outcomes, including analgesia and QoL. Duloxetine treatment was safe and well tolerated. These results suggest that duloxetine treatment could be associated with improvements in pain relief and QoL in Japanese patients with fibromyalgia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552057 . Registered 9 March 2012.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13075-015-0718-y

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Which dose of duloxetine is optimal for fibromyalgia remains controversial.

    “however, which dose is optimal for fibromyalgia remains controversial.”

    From Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Methods (Study design; page unavailable) describe titration to 60 mg, and the Discussion (Analgesic effect of duloxetine on fibromyalgia; page unavailable) notes that once-daily 60 mg was approved in other countries. Neither passage addresses whether the optimal dose is controversial; searches for optimal dosage and comparisons among doses found no such statement in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Japan College of Fibromyalgia Investigation. Diagnostic guidelines for fibromyalgia 2013. Japan Medical Journal Co., Ltd.; 2013. Japanese.
  2. [10]Matsumoto Y, Maeda S, Tamakoshi A, Nishioka K. [A nationwide epidemiological survey for patients with fibromyalgia in Japan]. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;18:87–92. Japanese.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murakami, M., Osada, K., Mizuno, H., Ochiai, T., Alev, L., & Nishioka, K.
Affiliations
  • Nihon University (JP)
  • St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP)
  • Shionogi (Japan) (JP)
  • Eli Lilly (Japan) (JP)
  • Tokyo Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nishioka, Kusuki
Venue
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Published
2015-08-22
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
224-224
ISSN
1478-6354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1883416684
Cited by
46
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis Research & Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Shionogi
  • Eli Lilly Japan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
duloxetine, fibromyalgia, Japanese patients, Brief Pain Inventory, quality of life, analgesia, treatment-emergent adverse events, sleepiness, drug safety, antidepressant efficacy
MeSH terms
Duloxetine Hydrochloride, Adult, Analgesics, Constipation, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Nasopharyngitis, Nausea, Outpatients, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review