Cited by 224Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo EffectPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Expectancy, fear and pain in the prediction of chronic pain and disability: a prospective analysis

Boersma, Katja, Linton, Steven J.·2006·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Studies with (sub) acute back pain patients show that negative expectancies predict pain and disability at a one-year follow up. Yet, it is not clear how expectations relate to other factors in the development of chronic disability such as pain and fear. This study investigates the relationship between expectations, pain-related fear and pain and studies how these variables are related to the development of chronic pain and disability. Subjects (N = 141) with back and/or neck pain (duration <1 year) were recruited via primary care. They completed measures on pain, expectancy, pain-related fear (pain-related negative affect and fear avoidance beliefs) and function. A one-year follow up was conducted with regard to pain and function. It was found that pain, expectancy, pain-related fear and function were strongly interrelated. In the cross-sectional analyses negative expectancies were best explained by frequent pain and a belief in an underlying and serious medical problem. Prospectively, negative expectancy, negative affect and a belief that activity may result in (re) injury or increased pain, explained unique variance in both pain and function at one-year follow up. In conclusion, expectancy, negative affect and fear avoidance beliefs are interrelated constructs that have predictive value for future pain and disability. Clinically, it can be helpful to inquire about beliefs, expectancy and distress as an indication of risk as well as to guide intervention. However, the strong interrelations between the variables call for precaution in treating them as if they were separate entities existing in reality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.08.004

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boersma, K., & Linton, S. J.
Affiliations
Örebro University (SE)
Corresponding author
Boersma, Katja
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
551-551
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2124097182
Cited by
224
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, disability, fear of pain, negative expectations, fear-avoidance beliefs, back pain, neck pain, pain-related disability, prognosis, pain beliefs, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Avoidance Learning, Back Pain, Chronic Disease, Disability Evaluation, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Set, Psychology, Neck Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review